Skip to main content

Sahelistan: the beginning of a new war

Inside Story - Berbers in North Africa by aljazeeraenglish
ARE the Western powers blindly plunging head on into a new war against forces more determined, better organised and higher equipped than those they faced in Iraq and Afghanistan? The talk of the town here these days is a newly published book, `Sahelistan` by a writer who, according to his own admission, is essentially an `adviser` to investors in the most inaccessible regions of the world. 
Samuel Laurent says his visits between early 2012 and early this year into the very heart of Sahelistan was supposed to be top secret. But the things he witnessed and the people he met there convinced him that Western leaders are making fatal blunders at the risk of paying enormous prices sooner or later; so it became incumbent upon him to talk about the matter publicly. But, before we proceed any further, let`s make sure we agree on what we mean by Sahelistan; we`re talking here of a 7,500 kilo-metre-wide ocean of sand and bare rocks in the central Sahara, with Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Libya in the north, and Mali, Niger, Chad and Sudan in the south. 

This is a desolate no man`s land where drugs and weapons traffickers and armed bandits have ruled for centuries. 
The southern Libyan side of the Sahara plays a major role in the shaping of Sahelistan as a refuge as well as training ground for extremist forces. In his final days in 2011, when the French air force planes were heavily bombarding Libya, the late Col Muammar Qadhafi had spokenrather prophetically: `Once I am gone, Libya will turn into the headquarters of a new war against Europe and America.

Today, affirms the book, the truth about the Libyan version of the `Arab Spring` amounts tragically to vengeful killings, arbitrary arrests, tortures, rapes and genocide as the order of the day. Nobody rules the country and thousands of armed men, including nomad Tuareg rebels, are rapidly settling down in different parts of Sahelistan and posing resistance to Western influence.

Even after the Egyptian, Tunisian and Libyan revolutions, says the book, the fast spreading power of AlQaeda was never fully grasped by the West and the media merely started taking a somewhat half-hearted interest in the subject following the assassination of US ambassador Christopher Stevens in Benghazi on the wellchosen, symbolic date of Sept 11 last year.Adamantlyrefusing to learn a lesson from the Libyan disaster, the French forces carried out vast military operations in northern Mali early this year. Although President François Hollande resisted the temptation of declaring `mission accomplished` à  la George Bush, the French media celebrated the killing of Mokhtar Belmokhtar, an Al Qaeda-linked military leader who had lost an eye during the Afghan war.

Barely a month ago, on May 23, an army base and a uranium treatment plant run by the French Areva enterprise in Niger were hit by forces close to Al Qaeda, causing the death of at least 12 soldiers. The supposedly `eliminated` Mokhtar Belmokhtar reappeared and claimed responsibility, promising to hit again at a time and place of his choice along the length and breadth of Sahelistan.

This hardly is an empty threat; the militants, rapidly forging alliances with local insurgentsand extremist groups like Ansar al Deen and Al Qaeda in Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), are today much deeply entrenched than ever.

Their ample resources come from arms and drugs trafficking ofcourse, but also considerably from cash ransoms paid by Europeans and Americans themselves for the release of their secret agents kidnapped while gathering intelligence in the guise of human rights workers.

In a region where young men are desperate to make a living, the masters of Sahelistan are using their easily earned money to offer relatively comfortable salaries to recruits, together with military training and Kalashnikov rifles.

The most surprising feature of Samuel Laurent`s book are the interviews of the jihadists themselves. Contrary to the widely accepted cliché of their being stubborn, blind fanatics, one is surprised by the lucid reasoning of their arguments. `Libya is neither Iraq nor Afghanistan,` says Mohammad el Gharabi, head of a clandestine military training camp not far from Benghazi, `and no Western powers are going to appoint a Noori alMaliki or a Hamid Karzai here.

As one digs deeper, one discovers a patient, wide-ranging plan projected far into the future for gaining power north and east of Sahelistan through political and military means (this already seems to be a reality in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt); then cross the Mediterranean to conquer Europe.

Does this sound crazy? Count André de la Roche, a retired diplomat who has spent a number of years in the Middle East, takes Samuel Laurent`s book seriously. He says the mighty Roman empire was brought to its knees by Christians coming from south of the Mediterranean and, should one need another proof, the Arabs conquered Spain in 711 to rule there for the next eight centuries.

The writer is a journalist base i in Paris. 

Peace-Forum Video Channel:

Popular posts from this blog

A historic moment in the Arab world

لحظة تاريخية في العالم العربي
As a democratic revolution led by tech-empowered young people sweeps the Arab world, Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera's director-general, shares a profoundly optimistic view of what's happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. In the first talk posted online from the TED 2011 conference in California, Khanfar describes the powerful moment when people realised they could step out of their homes and ask for change. "كما ثورة ديمقراطية بقيادة الشباب التكنولوجيا ذات صلاحيات تجتاح العالم العربي ، وضاح خنفر ، الجزيرة المدير العام والأسهم وجهة نظر متفائلة بشكل كبير ما يحدث في مصر وتونس وليبيا وخارجها. وفي اول حديث له نشر على الانترنت من مؤتمر تيد 2011 في ولاية كاليفورنيا ، خنفر يصف لحظة قوية عند الناس أدركت أنها لا يمكن الخروج من منازلهم ونطلب من أجل التغيير." This talk was given on March 1, 2011 in Long Beach, California. TED 2011 is taking place between March 1 and Mar…

Our Captured, Wounded Hearts: Arundhati Roy On Balakot, Kashmir And India

With his reckless “pre-emptive” airstrike on Balakot in Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has inadvertently undone what previous Indian governments almost miraculously, succeeded in doing for decades. Since 1947 the Indian Government has bristled at any suggestion that the conflict in Kashmir could be resolved by international arbitration, insisting that it is an “internal matter.” By goading Pakistan into a counter-strike, and so making India and Pakistan the only two nuclear powers in history to have bombed each other, Modi has internationalised the Kashmir dispute. He has demonstrated to the world that Kashmir is potentially the most dangerous place on earth, the flash-point for nuclear war. Every person, country, and organisation that worries about the prospect of nuclear war has the right to intervene and do everything in its power to prevent it.  Keep reading  >>>>

India has built around itself an aura of a global power whose time has come. For at least the last t…

Kashmir Jihad - Analysis & Options


Kashmir is an incomplete agenda of partition of India. Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought three wars on this issue. According to UN resolutions, Kashmiris have to decide their accession to Pakistan or India through impartial plebiscite, which could not take place due to Indian reluctance. Recently, India revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Kashmir, it was done to unilaterally integrate occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of the UN resolutions and the Simla bilateral agreement, which demands to maintain status quo until the final settlement. The US and world powers are emphasizing that Kashmir should be resolved bilaterally, though India has refused to hold talks with Pakistan. In the present scenario, while India has turned Kashmir into the largest prison of 9 million people, denying basic human rights and oppressing the Kashmiris' who want freedom from India, Pakistan cannot watch as a silent spec…