Skip to main content

Mideast peace talks: devil lies in the detail

US Secretary of State John Kerry`s efforts have led to an agreement in principle to resume Israeli-Palestinian peace talks but the devil remains in the details of the negotiating terms.

`I am pleased to announce that we have reached an agreement that establishes a basis for resuming direct final status negotiations between the Palestinians and the Israelis,` he told reporters in Amman late Friday.

The two sides are to meet in Washington within `the next week or so` to nail down the terms for peace talks.

`After he move d mountains to renew talks, Kerry has now reached the truly tough part, said the diplomatic correspondent of Israel`s Haaretz newspaper.

`The lack of trust between the sides is still strong and the gap between (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu and (Palestinian leader Mahmud) Abbas is still cavernous. Kerry will attempt to construct a bridge over the abyss but let`s hope he does not plunge down into oblivion.` The Palestinian presidency said it looked forward to `an agreement on the basis of a resumption of talks,` while stressing there were still `specific details that need to be resolved`.

However, Palestinian factions, embittered by the experience of the 1993 Oslo peace accords, were openly critical.

Independent MP Mustafa Barghuti rejected any return to the negotiating table without a clear reference to the borders which existed before the 1967 Middle East war and a halt to all Jewish settlement building He said any such talks would be a waste of time and nothing more than a time wasting exercise serving Netanyahu`s government.

`The experience of 20 years of negotiations has been enough to prove it was a mistake to sign the Oslo accords before a halt to settlement building. The number of settlers on occupied (Palestinian) land has since shot up from 150,000 to 600,000 now,` his movement said.

It warned against `falling into the trap of Oslo`.

The Palestinian Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a leftist faction within the PLO umbrella, said a return to peace talks outside the framework of the United Nations and its resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would amount to `political suicide`.

It urged the Palestinian leadership to resume its campaign to join international organisations, suspended at the request of Washington, especially judicial bodies which could put pressure on Israel `instead of submitting Palestinian rights that are guaranteed under international law to compromises and useless bets which have failed time and again`.

Palestinian political analyst Hani al-Masri was blunt in his assessment.

`Kerry`s attempts are destined to fail because Israel does not want to commit to references in any negotiating process, so it does not commit to anything,` he told AFP.

`Accepting a return to negotiations today for the Palestinian leadership would be tantamount to politicalsuicide and will not change the circumstances for which it has refused to do so previously.` According to Haaretz, `Netanyahu agreed to a series of gestures toward the Palestinians in the coming months, including the release of hundreds of prisoners. Over the past four months he has likewise restrained, relatively speaking, West Bank settlement construction, a slowdown which will hold as long as negotiations are on.

But `a big question mark remains around Netanyahu`s intentions`, the paper said.

`Is he interested only in a peace process or is he determined to reach a peace accord? If it is only a process he is after, he will have earned himself several months of quiet until the bluff is called.

`But if he is in it for the real thing, he will have to for the first time present clear stances and explain where for him Israel ends and Palestine begins.` A Palestinian official said: `The ball is now in Israel`s court. Kerry has proposed the bases for a resumption of negotiations and asked Netanyahu to respond favourably to one of them.

`The bases are the release of Palestinians jailed before the Oslo accords, minors, the sick or the elderly,` he said on condition of anonymity. `And that Israel recognise the 1967 (border) lines as a reference point, or a halt to settlement building.` The Palestinian official said the Israeli premier had agreed to hold a special cabinet session to draw up Israel`s response to Kerry`s proposals. If Israel accepts them, negotiations will resume.
Related:
Free-eBooks: http://goo.gl/2xpiv
Peace-Forum Video Channel: http://goo.gl/GLh75

Popular posts from this blog

A historic moment in the Arab world

لحظة تاريخية في العالم العربي
As a democratic revolution led by tech-empowered young people sweeps the Arab world, Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera's director-general, shares a profoundly optimistic view of what's happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. In the first talk posted online from the TED 2011 conference in California, Khanfar describes the powerful moment when people realised they could step out of their homes and ask for change. "كما ثورة ديمقراطية بقيادة الشباب التكنولوجيا ذات صلاحيات تجتاح العالم العربي ، وضاح خنفر ، الجزيرة المدير العام والأسهم وجهة نظر متفائلة بشكل كبير ما يحدث في مصر وتونس وليبيا وخارجها. وفي اول حديث له نشر على الانترنت من مؤتمر تيد 2011 في ولاية كاليفورنيا ، خنفر يصف لحظة قوية عند الناس أدركت أنها لا يمكن الخروج من منازلهم ونطلب من أجل التغيير."
http://www.ted.com/talks/wadah_khanfar_a_historic_moment_in_the_arab_world.html This talk was given on March 1, 2011 in Long Beach, California. TED 2011 is taking place between March 1 and Mar…

Our Captured, Wounded Hearts: Arundhati Roy On Balakot, Kashmir And India

With his reckless “pre-emptive” airstrike on Balakot in Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has inadvertently undone what previous Indian governments almost miraculously, succeeded in doing for decades. Since 1947 the Indian Government has bristled at any suggestion that the conflict in Kashmir could be resolved by international arbitration, insisting that it is an “internal matter.” By goading Pakistan into a counter-strike, and so making India and Pakistan the only two nuclear powers in history to have bombed each other, Modi has internationalised the Kashmir dispute. He has demonstrated to the world that Kashmir is potentially the most dangerous place on earth, the flash-point for nuclear war. Every person, country, and organisation that worries about the prospect of nuclear war has the right to intervene and do everything in its power to prevent it.  Keep reading  >>>>


India has built around itself an aura of a global power whose time has come. For at least the last t…

Kashmir Jihad - Analysis & Options

PDF: http://bit.ly/2k0Vqpm

Kashmir is an incomplete agenda of partition of India. Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought three wars on this issue. According to UN resolutions, Kashmiris have to decide their accession to Pakistan or India through impartial plebiscite, which could not take place due to Indian reluctance. Recently, India revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Kashmir, it was done to unilaterally integrate occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of the UN resolutions and the Simla bilateral agreement, which demands to maintain status quo until the final settlement. The US and world powers are emphasizing that Kashmir should be resolved bilaterally, though India has refused to hold talks with Pakistan. In the present scenario, while India has turned Kashmir into the largest prison of 9 million people, denying basic human rights and oppressing the Kashmiris' who want freedom from India, Pakistan cannot watch as a silent spec…