Skip to main content

Muslim world in flames

FROM Pakistan to the Levant, the Muslim world is burning in a self-lift fire, the ‘confrontation without’ having given way to ‘a confrontation within’.

Beyond the Levant, as in North Africa, Maghreb and Muslim sub-Sahara, instability, violence and uncertainty reign. Political movements have turned religious, and the religious ones have degenerated into sectarian bloodbaths.
Hoisted by its own petard, Pakistan has a story to tell. Decades ago, nobody believed the militants tasked by America with defeating the Soviet Union in Afghanistan would one day become Pakistan’s most implacable foes, turn into sectarian hounds, demoralise the armed forces, and eat into its vitals.

In the Arab world, the fragrance of the Spring has turned into an overpowering stench enveloping the Fertile Crescent and its neighbourhood. As the phoney stability imposed by the dictators gave way to anarchy, the character of the Arab Spring changed.

Ben Ali, Hosni Mubarak, Ali Abdullah Saleh and Muammar Qadhafi fell — until the Spring attempted a blossoming in Syria. Suddenly, as Bashar al-Assad fought back to preserve the 40 years of dynastic rule, madness descended — and not only on the Syrians.

Within months, a power line-up had come into being, with nearly a dozen states and sanctimonious cults baying for Muslim blood.

These included Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Hezbollah, a bewildering variety of Al Qaeda factions, the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (into which Syria’s Jabhat al-Nusra merged), the newly formed Islamic Front, and last not but not least battle-hardened Pakistani Taliban — a reincarnation of Changez Khan’s bloodthirsty hordes, who gloried in tossing babies on lances.

Over 115,000 are dead, a vast majority of them Muslim. Watching in tension on the sidelines are Jordan and Turkey, both hosting Syrian refugees whose overall number has crossed two million.

This sectarian fire — this confrontation within — has replaced what until Anwar Saadat’s assassination was a confrontation without. Until that fateful October day, the eighth anniversary of the 1973 Ramazan war, when Nasser’s successor was gunned down, the Arab world appeared one monolithic unit.

It had no religion and no sect. Ruling the hearts and minds of the Arab people was the fervent nationalism unleashed by Gamal Abdel Nasser. The gradual erosion of this spirit of ‘confrontation without’ was a phenomenon not confined to the Arab world; it affected the landmass from Pakistan to Morocco. There were reasons why.

Giants Nasser, Faisal, Ben Bella, Boumediene and Bhutto were followed by midgets who considered the expedient American commitment to their tyranny an alternative to popular mandate.

Jerusalem, Iraq, Afghanistan, Gujarat, Sabra-Shatila, Bosnia, 9/11: the very dimensions of these challenges and humiliations were beyond their comprehension.

Afghanistan turned out to be a tragedy: it became the source of religious militancy for the Muslim world. Pakistan, of course, gets the blame, perhaps rightly, but let us note that the US-led West just walked off after the Soviet defeat, saddling Pakistan and the region with well-armed, uncontrollable jihadis euphoric over their triumph.

With the Left demoralised as the Soviet camp collapsed, it was the religious parties which filled the vacuum when the strongmen fell. The religious right had not been idle during these decades of dictatorship: it utilised this rights-less era by expanding community networks and earning the people’s gratitude.

In this category fell the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates in Egypt and the Maghreb; and the Jamaat-i-Islami in Pakistan. No wonder, the religious parties today occupy centre stage in this intra-Muslim conflagration that shows no signs of dying out.

The jihadis have now virtually abandoned the cause of Muslims under foreign occupation, except as catchy shibboleths. Their principal enemies now are fellow Muslims and the minorities. This fixation on a self-invented enemy within the Muslim milieu reflects an inquisitionist credo of basically sick minds.

In Pakistan, the Taliban are massacring Shias; in the Levant, non-Syrian Sunni militias and Hezbollah have turned the anti-Baathist struggle for democratic rights into a sectarian strife; in Bahrain, Saudi troops are helping the Sunni monarchy crush the Shia rebellion; Iraq is witnessing a throwback to the 2006 sectarian conflict with fatalities this year close to 6,000, and Riyadh is as much concerned over Iran’s nuclear quest as Tel Aviv.

Here we can see two incompatible phenomena: Muslim governments’ anxiety to safeguard their national interests and the international jihadi fraternity’s cold-blooded indifference to Muslim states’ geopolitical concerns.

This disregard for state interests stems from the militants’ quizzical contention that Islam doesn’t believe in nation-states. The absurdity of the practical implications of this theory was acknowledged by Maulana Maudoodi when he gave up this ‘Trotskyite’ belief and headed for Pakistan to set up an Islamic state.

No wonder, extraterritorial loyalties are ingrained in Pakistani Islamists’ theory and practice, as reflected in Syed Munawwar Hassan’s conferment of shahadat on a man who was supreme commander of a rebel army which was, and is, at war with the state of Pakistan. Notice that Chinese have been a major target for the Taliban and Lal Masjid rebels.

Rawalpindi on Ashura was symptomatic of what ails the Muslim world. Worldwide, the Islamists could have advanced their cause by democratic means. They had the means to influence people. That — unknown to Imran Khan — they should massacre their own people is a tragedy for the Muslim world.

They are destroying what potentially could have been the bastion of their power. The anarchy now reigning in the Muslim heartland has made the suffering people develop nostalgia for the ousted tyrants.

With Syria’s chemical weapons confiscated, the UN has no interest in peace in the Levant. So brother Muslims are welcome to keep fighting till hell freezes over.

Angola bans Islam and shuts down all mosques across the country because it 'clashes with state religion of Christianity'
Minister of culture described Islam as a 'sect' which is banned as counter to Angolan customs and culture
Nation's president said: ‘This is the final end of Islamic influence in our country'

کیا آپ پاکستان کے حالات سے پریشان ہیں؟
 اپنے پیارے وطن کے لیے کچھ کرنا چاہتے ہیں؟
مزید اس لنک پر

If you are concerned about Pakistan and want to do some thing, find more at the link below:

Peace-Forum Video Channel:

Popular posts from this blog

A historic moment in the Arab world

لحظة تاريخية في العالم العربي
As a democratic revolution led by tech-empowered young people sweeps the Arab world, Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera's director-general, shares a profoundly optimistic view of what's happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. In the first talk posted online from the TED 2011 conference in California, Khanfar describes the powerful moment when people realised they could step out of their homes and ask for change. "كما ثورة ديمقراطية بقيادة الشباب التكنولوجيا ذات صلاحيات تجتاح العالم العربي ، وضاح خنفر ، الجزيرة المدير العام والأسهم وجهة نظر متفائلة بشكل كبير ما يحدث في مصر وتونس وليبيا وخارجها. وفي اول حديث له نشر على الانترنت من مؤتمر تيد 2011 في ولاية كاليفورنيا ، خنفر يصف لحظة قوية عند الناس أدركت أنها لا يمكن الخروج من منازلهم ونطلب من أجل التغيير." This talk was given on March 1, 2011 in Long Beach, California. TED 2011 is taking place between March 1 and Mar…

Kashmir Jihad - Analysis & Options


Kashmir is an incomplete agenda of partition of India. Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought three wars on this issue. According to UN resolutions, Kashmiris have to decide their accession to Pakistan or India through impartial plebiscite, which could not take place due to Indian reluctance. Recently, India revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Kashmir, it was done to unilaterally integrate occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of the UN resolutions and the Simla bilateral agreement, which demands to maintain status quo until the final settlement. The US and world powers are emphasizing that Kashmir should be resolved bilaterally, though India has refused to hold talks with Pakistan. In the present scenario, while India has turned Kashmir into the largest prison of 9 million people, denying basic human rights and oppressing the Kashmiris' who want freedom from India, Pakistan cannot watch as a silent spec…

Our Captured, Wounded Hearts: Arundhati Roy On Balakot, Kashmir And India

With his reckless “pre-emptive” airstrike on Balakot in Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has inadvertently undone what previous Indian governments almost miraculously, succeeded in doing for decades. Since 1947 the Indian Government has bristled at any suggestion that the conflict in Kashmir could be resolved by international arbitration, insisting that it is an “internal matter.” By goading Pakistan into a counter-strike, and so making India and Pakistan the only two nuclear powers in history to have bombed each other, Modi has internationalised the Kashmir dispute. He has demonstrated to the world that Kashmir is potentially the most dangerous place on earth, the flash-point for nuclear war. Every person, country, and organisation that worries about the prospect of nuclear war has the right to intervene and do everything in its power to prevent it.  Keep reading  >>>>

India has built around itself an aura of a global power whose time has come. For at least the last t…