Skip to main content

Close Guantánamo

ONE of President Barack Obama’s first official acts in January 2009 was to sign an executive order to close the US military detention centre at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, within a year.

After eight years of detentions at Guantánamo, this held out a promise of change. But the order’s failure to recognise the USA’s human rights obligations, coupled with the Obama administration’s adoption of its predecessor’s flawed “law of war” framework, have brought no end to the indefinite detentions.

Jan 22, 2014 will mark five years since President Obama’s executive order. In the meantime, the prison camp has continued to operate in a human rights vacuum.

The Guantánamo detentions remain an affront to international human rights principles and undermine the USA’s credibility. As the prison camp enters its 13th year, the world must take the US to task for its abject failure to live up to the international human rights standards it so often demands of others.

Twelve years after the first detainees were brought to Guantánamo, strapped down in planes like cargo, more than 150 men are still held there. Most of them have never been charged or tried. Respecting the victims’ right to justice would have meant charging and bringing such individuals to fair trial in ordinary civilian courts years ago.

Despite a US Supreme Court ruling — five and a half years ago — that the Guantánamo detainees had the constitutional right to a ‘prompt’ hearing to challenge the lawfulness of their detentions, some detainees have yet to have a habeas corpus ruling.

In the twisted legal logic of Guantánamo, even a judicial finding that an individual’s detention is unlawful may not mean his immediate release.

The transfer last month of three Chinese ethnic Uighur men to Slovakia came more than five years after a US federal judge ruled their detention unlawful. If the US would do what it asks other countries to do — to take into the US released detainees who cannot be repatriated — the Uighurs could have been released immediately after the judicial ruling in their case.

More than 70 others — the majority of them Yemenis — have been “approved for transfer”, but the USA’s view of the security situation in their home countries and other issues have delayed their release.

A few detainees face trial under a military commission system that does not meet international fair trial standards. Six currently face the possibility of the death penalty.

Of the almost 800 detainees that have been held there, only seven — or less than 1pc — have been convicted under the military commission system — five of whom pleaded guilty under pre-trial agreements that promised a possible way out of the base.

Meanwhile, the absence of accountability, truth and remedy for human rights violations committed against former and current Guantánamo detainees is a festering injustice that leaves the US in serious violation of its international human rights obligations.

Guantánamo detainees have been tortured and subjected to other ill-treatment — either in Guantánamo or elsewhere in US custody before they got there — including ‘water-boarding’, being held in prolonged isolation, and, more recently, cruel force-feeding procedures in response to a mass hunger strike in protest at their ongoing detention. Nine detainees have died in custody — two of natural causes and seven suicides.

If any other country was responsible for this human rights vacuum, it would surely draw the condemnation of the US. But the US has allowed the Guantánamo detentions and the accountability gap to persist even as it has continued to trumpet its commitment to human rights.

This double standard has not gone unnoticed. Other governments, United Nations experts and non-governmental organisations have been among those who have called for an end to the Guantánamo detentions.

Even the first commander of detentions at the base, now retired Maj Gen Michael Lehnert, recently said that the Guantánamo detention facility “should never have been opened”. In his estimation, the detention and torture there had “squandered the goodwill of the world” following the Sept 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the US.

Closing Guantánamo must mean ending the violations it has come to represent — simply relocating them is unacceptable. The world should press the US to drop its flawed “global war” legal framework. Congress and the Obama administration should commit to a counterterrorism strategy that fully complies with international law and standards.

No line can be drawn under Guantánamo without full accountability for the human rights violations, including crimes under international law, that have been committed at the base and elsewhere in the USA’s “global war on terror”.

Closing the detention centre won’t bring about such accountability overnight. But doing so remains an important — and necessary — step in the right direction.

By:  ERIKA GUEVARA ROSAS; director for the Americas at Amnesty International.
http://m.dawn.com/news/1081708/close-guantanamo

Popular posts from this blog

A historic moment in the Arab world

لحظة تاريخية في العالم العربي
As a democratic revolution led by tech-empowered young people sweeps the Arab world, Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera's director-general, shares a profoundly optimistic view of what's happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. In the first talk posted online from the TED 2011 conference in California, Khanfar describes the powerful moment when people realised they could step out of their homes and ask for change. "كما ثورة ديمقراطية بقيادة الشباب التكنولوجيا ذات صلاحيات تجتاح العالم العربي ، وضاح خنفر ، الجزيرة المدير العام والأسهم وجهة نظر متفائلة بشكل كبير ما يحدث في مصر وتونس وليبيا وخارجها. وفي اول حديث له نشر على الانترنت من مؤتمر تيد 2011 في ولاية كاليفورنيا ، خنفر يصف لحظة قوية عند الناس أدركت أنها لا يمكن الخروج من منازلهم ونطلب من أجل التغيير."
http://www.ted.com/talks/wadah_khanfar_a_historic_moment_in_the_arab_world.html This talk was given on March 1, 2011 in Long Beach, California. TED 2011 is taking place between March 1 and Mar…

Our Captured, Wounded Hearts: Arundhati Roy On Balakot, Kashmir And India

With his reckless “pre-emptive” airstrike on Balakot in Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has inadvertently undone what previous Indian governments almost miraculously, succeeded in doing for decades. Since 1947 the Indian Government has bristled at any suggestion that the conflict in Kashmir could be resolved by international arbitration, insisting that it is an “internal matter.” By goading Pakistan into a counter-strike, and so making India and Pakistan the only two nuclear powers in history to have bombed each other, Modi has internationalised the Kashmir dispute. He has demonstrated to the world that Kashmir is potentially the most dangerous place on earth, the flash-point for nuclear war. Every person, country, and organisation that worries about the prospect of nuclear war has the right to intervene and do everything in its power to prevent it.  Keep reading  >>>>


India has built around itself an aura of a global power whose time has come. For at least the last t…

Kashmir Jihad - Analysis & Options

PDF: http://bit.ly/2k0Vqpm

Kashmir is an incomplete agenda of partition of India. Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought three wars on this issue. According to UN resolutions, Kashmiris have to decide their accession to Pakistan or India through impartial plebiscite, which could not take place due to Indian reluctance. Recently, India revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Kashmir, it was done to unilaterally integrate occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of the UN resolutions and the Simla bilateral agreement, which demands to maintain status quo until the final settlement. The US and world powers are emphasizing that Kashmir should be resolved bilaterally, though India has refused to hold talks with Pakistan. In the present scenario, while India has turned Kashmir into the largest prison of 9 million people, denying basic human rights and oppressing the Kashmiris' who want freedom from India, Pakistan cannot watch as a silent spec…