Skip to main content

Gandhi on Hindu-Muslim unity and divide

KEEN against the background of the bloody situation in Karachi, the arrival of Dr Rajmohan Gandhi as the chief guest at the Karachi Literature Festival was of great significance. The very fact of his being the grandson of Gandhiji appeared to impart a grace to his personality. He soon became the centre of attraction for the crowd.
Each session where he was expected to speak attracted an extraordinarily large crowd.
This led to a revival of interest in the enigmatic personality of Gandhiji. The youngsters, who knew so little about him, appeared keen to find out more. This curiosity about Gandhiji in the younger generations of Pakistan is justified. He stood distinguished among his contemporaries not just for being the leading figure of the Indian freedom movement but also because of the fact that his peculiar way of living and thinking gave the impression of his being a sage.
In consequence, he gained a distinct aura around his personality.
Fortunately, one recent Pakistani publication in Urdu may provide a glimpse of the man forthe benefit of inquisitive souls.
Translated from English and published by Sang-e-Meel under the title Sawal-o-Jawab, the book takes us back to the period when the Khilafat Movement was at its peak, bringing Muslims and Hindus together on the same page with Gandhiji at the forefront.
Gandhiji had devised a way to keep in touch with people in general. In his weekly paper, Young India, he responded sympathetically to the letters written to him.
He dealt with the questions put to him and tried to convince the questioner to the best of his ability. In Sawal-o-Jawab, the compiler has made a selection from those writings by Gandhiji in which he is responding to questions put forward by Muslims.
One Muslim gentleman writing to Gandhiji asks a question relating to Hindu-Muslim problems, calling the two religious groups `born enemies.` `These words (Hindus and the Muslims being born enemies) are the inventionsof our common enemy,` writes Gandhiji. He adds: `Hindus made a lot of progress under the rule of the Muslims. So was the case with Muslims living under Hindu rule.
The two groups had developed an understanding that internecine fighting is tantamount to committing suicide. So they decided for peaceful co-existence. But with the arrival of the Englishman, they once again started fighting.
In the Oct 20, 1921, issue of Young India, Gandhiji refers to a comment made by the Modern Review that the present HinduMuslim unity is just a show. He writes, `I and Ali Brothers claim to believe with sincerity in our respective religions. In spite of that we three are heartily so close that no other three souls can claim to be so close to each other. This unity is not a fraud nor a show business. It stands on the basis of deep respect and a sense of tolerance for each others` beliefs and habits.
Now we all deeply believe that unless we are united we cannotachieve freedom. And I can say very boldly that in the absence of such a unity, the Muslims cannot provide the kind of help they wish to provide to the Khilafat Movement. We should have full faith in Hindu-Muslim unity, a unity for ever and under all circumstances.
But, alas! This unity could not last long. A young Muslim man in his letter asked Gandhiji, `Do you expect to achieve Swaraj just by your own efforts or with the help of Hindus alone?` Gandhiji, as quoted in the book, replied, `I never dreamt of achieving Swaraj singly with my own efforts or with the help of Hindus alone. I stand in need of the cooperation of Muslims, Parsis, Christians, Sikhs, Jews and all the Indians. And most of all, I stand in need of God`s help.` He then added: `I know that I don`t enjoy the cooperation of Ali Brothers now. Maulana Shaukat Ali too does not now stand in support of me. Do you think I don`t miss them. But if I stand for truth, they will come back and join me.They cannot afford to stand estranged for long from the present struggle.
But they did not come back. The fissure was too deep. It was a goodbye for ever. And it was later on one occasion in 1931 that Gandhiji, overwhelmed by a mood of despondency, said, `I have trained myself in a way that I go on smiling while a storm is brewing deep inside me. But now this storm seems to be getting out of my control. I feel very worried.
Maybe someone from the Muslims will relieve me of my fear and cowardice.` While saying these words he lost control over himself and broke down.
But how ironic that the person who eventually relieved him of his fears was a Hindu, not a Muslim.
Gandhi on Hindu-Muslim unity and divide. By Intizar Husain
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Humanity, Religion, Culture, Ethics, Science, Spirituality & Peace
Peace Forum Network

Popular posts from this blog

A historic moment in the Arab world

لحظة تاريخية في العالم العربي
As a democratic revolution led by tech-empowered young people sweeps the Arab world, Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera's director-general, shares a profoundly optimistic view of what's happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. In the first talk posted online from the TED 2011 conference in California, Khanfar describes the powerful moment when people realised they could step out of their homes and ask for change. "كما ثورة ديمقراطية بقيادة الشباب التكنولوجيا ذات صلاحيات تجتاح العالم العربي ، وضاح خنفر ، الجزيرة المدير العام والأسهم وجهة نظر متفائلة بشكل كبير ما يحدث في مصر وتونس وليبيا وخارجها. وفي اول حديث له نشر على الانترنت من مؤتمر تيد 2011 في ولاية كاليفورنيا ، خنفر يصف لحظة قوية عند الناس أدركت أنها لا يمكن الخروج من منازلهم ونطلب من أجل التغيير." This talk was given on March 1, 2011 in Long Beach, California. TED 2011 is taking place between March 1 and Mar…

Our Captured, Wounded Hearts: Arundhati Roy On Balakot, Kashmir And India

With his reckless “pre-emptive” airstrike on Balakot in Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has inadvertently undone what previous Indian governments almost miraculously, succeeded in doing for decades. Since 1947 the Indian Government has bristled at any suggestion that the conflict in Kashmir could be resolved by international arbitration, insisting that it is an “internal matter.” By goading Pakistan into a counter-strike, and so making India and Pakistan the only two nuclear powers in history to have bombed each other, Modi has internationalised the Kashmir dispute. He has demonstrated to the world that Kashmir is potentially the most dangerous place on earth, the flash-point for nuclear war. Every person, country, and organisation that worries about the prospect of nuclear war has the right to intervene and do everything in its power to prevent it.  Keep reading  >>>>

India has built around itself an aura of a global power whose time has come. For at least the last t…

Kashmir Jihad - Analysis & Options


Kashmir is an incomplete agenda of partition of India. Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought three wars on this issue. According to UN resolutions, Kashmiris have to decide their accession to Pakistan or India through impartial plebiscite, which could not take place due to Indian reluctance. Recently, India revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Kashmir, it was done to unilaterally integrate occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of the UN resolutions and the Simla bilateral agreement, which demands to maintain status quo until the final settlement. The US and world powers are emphasizing that Kashmir should be resolved bilaterally, though India has refused to hold talks with Pakistan. In the present scenario, while India has turned Kashmir into the largest prison of 9 million people, denying basic human rights and oppressing the Kashmiris' who want freedom from India, Pakistan cannot watch as a silent spec…