Skip to main content

The West’s Debt to Egypt

The huge protests in Egypt that have been taking place for the past weeks have paid off. Great sacrifices have been made, and hundreds of people have lost their lives, since millions of Egyptians took to the streets in Cairo and other cities throughout the country with the same demand that the dictator Hosni Mubarak must step down. On February 11th, 2011, he did.
The mood in the protests turned from resilient determination, to celebration in minutes and this positive mood continues throughout the country as people feel renewed hope that life, in Egypt, will be better.
Protestors laid siege to the parliament, the government, and the notorious ministry of interior, which witnessed the murder and injury of thousands of Egyptians. Time was not on the side of the regime - which was obviously stalling – as the revolution gained momentum day by day.
This revolution was not based on desire for power from any one group, or even for economic reform; it was based on an overwhelming desire for freedom. It was driven by the educated youth, rather than the poorer classes who had been crushed under the previous police state. It gained popularity as Egyptians balanced values such as democracy, freedom, justice, dignity and transparency on one hand, and despotism, oppression, injustice, humiliation and corruption on the other.
Harking back to its usual tactics, the regime used the language of threats, with former intelligence chief Omar Suleiman warning the protests would not be tolerated much longer and asserting that Mubarak would not step down. As protestors protested, and the autocratic regime threatened, Mubarak’s security forces continued kidnapping, interrogating and torturing activists, even taking them from their homes. Driven by pride and desire to maintain their power and wealth, Mubarak and his regime failed to understand that activists were not in control of the will of the people which had its own impulse and power.
The regime’s security forces – notorious for their brutality – continued to murder protesters in parts of the country where they thought they could get away with it. The reasons why Mubarak was stalling for time and clinging desperately to power until the last minute becomes clear when it is known that his wealth, in British and Swiss banks alone, is estimated at between $40bn and $70bn. He also has bank accounts in other countries, property and real estate, and gold and diamonds. The people who made up his regime, past and present, also have huge fortunes in western banks that resulted directly from obscene corruption.
The significant question that must now be asked is: Why has the west remained silent about this corruption, and the terrible violations of human rights in Egypt and the region, turning a blind eye to the torture and killing? Also, what will be the policy and stance of the west in the future formation of Egypt’s democratic government? Will they sincerely adhere to their principles of social justice, or will they follow Omar Suleiman’s opinion that the Arab world is not ready for democracy?
After the unequivocal statements made by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt that it seeks a civil society and democratic and economic reforms based on the will of the people, will the west continue its paranoia concerning all things ‘Muslim’ and ‘Islamic’? The overall peaceful behavior of the protestors was based on Islamic teachings concerning ethics and behavior. The masses praying publicly for justice and peace should clearly indicate to the west that their fears of a Muslim nation are unfounded. It is clear that the Egyptian revolution embraced all elements of society, seeking universal values– the most important of which is freedom.
The west now bears a moral responsibility to make up for its apathy throughout the last three decades when Egyptians suffered under the US-supported Mubarak regime. The Egyptian people lived in a police state, occupied by a two million-strong militarized police force while the west turned a deaf ear.
The moral obligation of the west toward the people of Egypt should not just take the form of mere diplomacy; but real tangible support to ensure power is passed to the people, and that the country is supported in its economic and democratic development.
This is the least the west can do to compensate for the years of western support for these injustices. The money looted from Egypt should be returned and a US-supported democratic government in Egypt should use the returned funds to resolve the huge problems this regime has left as its legacy.

Popular posts from this blog

A historic moment in the Arab world

لحظة تاريخية في العالم العربي
As a democratic revolution led by tech-empowered young people sweeps the Arab world, Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera's director-general, shares a profoundly optimistic view of what's happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. In the first talk posted online from the TED 2011 conference in California, Khanfar describes the powerful moment when people realised they could step out of their homes and ask for change. "كما ثورة ديمقراطية بقيادة الشباب التكنولوجيا ذات صلاحيات تجتاح العالم العربي ، وضاح خنفر ، الجزيرة المدير العام والأسهم وجهة نظر متفائلة بشكل كبير ما يحدث في مصر وتونس وليبيا وخارجها. وفي اول حديث له نشر على الانترنت من مؤتمر تيد 2011 في ولاية كاليفورنيا ، خنفر يصف لحظة قوية عند الناس أدركت أنها لا يمكن الخروج من منازلهم ونطلب من أجل التغيير." This talk was given on March 1, 2011 in Long Beach, California. TED 2011 is taking place between March 1 and Mar…

Our Captured, Wounded Hearts: Arundhati Roy On Balakot, Kashmir And India

With his reckless “pre-emptive” airstrike on Balakot in Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has inadvertently undone what previous Indian governments almost miraculously, succeeded in doing for decades. Since 1947 the Indian Government has bristled at any suggestion that the conflict in Kashmir could be resolved by international arbitration, insisting that it is an “internal matter.” By goading Pakistan into a counter-strike, and so making India and Pakistan the only two nuclear powers in history to have bombed each other, Modi has internationalised the Kashmir dispute. He has demonstrated to the world that Kashmir is potentially the most dangerous place on earth, the flash-point for nuclear war. Every person, country, and organisation that worries about the prospect of nuclear war has the right to intervene and do everything in its power to prevent it.  Keep reading  >>>>

India has built around itself an aura of a global power whose time has come. For at least the last t…

Kashmir Jihad - Analysis & Options


Kashmir is an incomplete agenda of partition of India. Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought three wars on this issue. According to UN resolutions, Kashmiris have to decide their accession to Pakistan or India through impartial plebiscite, which could not take place due to Indian reluctance. Recently, India revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Kashmir, it was done to unilaterally integrate occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of the UN resolutions and the Simla bilateral agreement, which demands to maintain status quo until the final settlement. The US and world powers are emphasizing that Kashmir should be resolved bilaterally, though India has refused to hold talks with Pakistan. In the present scenario, while India has turned Kashmir into the largest prison of 9 million people, denying basic human rights and oppressing the Kashmiris' who want freedom from India, Pakistan cannot watch as a silent spec…