Skip to main content

Secular France Wondering What to Do With Islam "France laïque se demander quoi faire avec l'islam"


In December of 2007 during a trip to Rome, the president of France made an appeal for a "positive secularity." Benedict XVI called the president's wording a "fine expression" when he visited France the following year.
President Nicolas Sarkozy is now looking at another nuance of this secularity. He wants a national debate to examine "laïcité" and how it relates to Islam -- an issue expected to carry weight in the nation's 2012 elections .
Muslims make up perhaps as much as 10% of France's population of nearly 65 million. And according to Sarkozy, the growing presence and influence of Islam in France is not something to be ignored.
His party, the UMP (Union for a Popular Movement), has organized a convention for April 5 on worship in a secular republic, and particularly Muslim worship.
In a Feb. 16 speech to UMP deputies, the president criticized "a growing gulf between the media portrayal of Islam and the preoccupations of the French people." He suggested that the immigration issue was ignored in the 80s with unwelcome consequences. "It was a taboo subject," he said. "The same thing is happening with Islam in France right now."
Sarkozy wants some concrete proposals this year on issues such as where Muslims worship -- a question that has growing relevance because of some Muslims accustoming themselves to praying on the street, ostensibly bec ause the mosques are not big enough to hold them all.
"We need to have a debate on prayer meetings in the streets," Sarkozy told the UMP. "In a secular country, we cannot tolerate having a public call to prayer."
Winds of change
France is legally secular, with a 1905 law on separation of religion and state that stipulates the government does not recognize or subsidize any religion.
However, the secretary of state for housing, Benoist Apparu, floated the idea of government aid in constructing mosques.
The minister of budget, François Baroin, however, said any change to the 1905 law would be opening a Pandora's Box. He affirmed there is no change on the government's agenda.
Adding his view in a Feb. 17 interview with Le Figaro, Alain Juppe, who has just been named the foreign minister, had this to say: "Republican law must be applied in conditions of equality for all. Diversity certainl y exists, but the republican principle [...] is that the law cannot accept differentiations based on religious or ethnic criteria." "In regard to rights, it is imperative to affirm that Muslims, like Catholics, Jews, Protestants and the rest, have the right to be able to practice their faith," he added.
He also spoke of duties, such as respect for the values of the republic, particularly "equality between man and woman."
The former prime minister also called for prudence. "It is necessary to conduct and control this debate because it can go off in all directions. Islam is France's second religion and its stigmatization is not conceivable."
A former minister of justice who now is a member of the European Parliament, Rachida Dati, shared similar caution. "The debate on Islam, which is not a problem for me, is pertinent. But it is necessary to be careful, and it is important to say it, so as not to stigmatize Islam a s a religion and not stigmatize Muslims, who in the first place are French," she told France 2.
One or many?
One thing is clear: German Chancellor Angela Merkel in October of 2010, British Prime Minister David Cameron, in his Feb. 5 address at the 47th Conference on Security in Munich, as well as President Sarkozy have rejected "multi-culturalism" or what derives from it.
"We do not want a society in which communities coexist one beside the other," Sarkozy said Feb. 10. "When one arrives in France one accepts incorporation in a single community, the national community."
But a multicultural and multiethnic society was defended by three ecologist politicians -- Esther Benbassa, Noel Mamere and Eva Joly, of Europe Ecologie. "Integration and assimilation are authoritarian movements that come from above, which do not take into consideration the human realities," they said in a public forum published Jan. 27 in the newspaper Liberation.
The trio made an appeal in favor of what they call "a national secularity that recognizes the part of ethnic, cultural, religious and linguistic membership."


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2681592/posts



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~








Popular posts from this blog

A historic moment in the Arab world

لحظة تاريخية في العالم العربي
As a democratic revolution led by tech-empowered young people sweeps the Arab world, Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera's director-general, shares a profoundly optimistic view of what's happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. In the first talk posted online from the TED 2011 conference in California, Khanfar describes the powerful moment when people realised they could step out of their homes and ask for change. "كما ثورة ديمقراطية بقيادة الشباب التكنولوجيا ذات صلاحيات تجتاح العالم العربي ، وضاح خنفر ، الجزيرة المدير العام والأسهم وجهة نظر متفائلة بشكل كبير ما يحدث في مصر وتونس وليبيا وخارجها. وفي اول حديث له نشر على الانترنت من مؤتمر تيد 2011 في ولاية كاليفورنيا ، خنفر يصف لحظة قوية عند الناس أدركت أنها لا يمكن الخروج من منازلهم ونطلب من أجل التغيير."
http://www.ted.com/talks/wadah_khanfar_a_historic_moment_in_the_arab_world.html This talk was given on March 1, 2011 in Long Beach, California. TED 2011 is taking place between March 1 and Mar…

Our Captured, Wounded Hearts: Arundhati Roy On Balakot, Kashmir And India

With his reckless “pre-emptive” airstrike on Balakot in Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has inadvertently undone what previous Indian governments almost miraculously, succeeded in doing for decades. Since 1947 the Indian Government has bristled at any suggestion that the conflict in Kashmir could be resolved by international arbitration, insisting that it is an “internal matter.” By goading Pakistan into a counter-strike, and so making India and Pakistan the only two nuclear powers in history to have bombed each other, Modi has internationalised the Kashmir dispute. He has demonstrated to the world that Kashmir is potentially the most dangerous place on earth, the flash-point for nuclear war. Every person, country, and organisation that worries about the prospect of nuclear war has the right to intervene and do everything in its power to prevent it.  Keep reading  >>>>


India has built around itself an aura of a global power whose time has come. For at least the last t…

Kashmir Jihad - Analysis & Options

PDF: http://bit.ly/2k0Vqpm

Kashmir is an incomplete agenda of partition of India. Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought three wars on this issue. According to UN resolutions, Kashmiris have to decide their accession to Pakistan or India through impartial plebiscite, which could not take place due to Indian reluctance. Recently, India revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Kashmir, it was done to unilaterally integrate occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of the UN resolutions and the Simla bilateral agreement, which demands to maintain status quo until the final settlement. The US and world powers are emphasizing that Kashmir should be resolved bilaterally, though India has refused to hold talks with Pakistan. In the present scenario, while India has turned Kashmir into the largest prison of 9 million people, denying basic human rights and oppressing the Kashmiris' who want freedom from India, Pakistan cannot watch as a silent spec…