Featured Post

SalaamOne NetWork

SalaamOne سلام   is   a nonprofit e-Forum to promote peace among humanity, through understanding and tolerance of religions, cul...

Showing posts with label Crusades. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crusades. Show all posts

Tony Blair makes qualified apology for Iraq war ahead of Chilcot report

Tony Blair has moved to prepare the ground for the publication of the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war by offering a qualified apology for the use of misleading intelligence and the failure to prepare for the aftermath of the invasion.

In an interview with Fareed Zakaria on CNN, the former British prime minister declined to apologise for the war itself and defended armed intervention in 2003, pointing to the current civil war in Syria to highlight the dangers of inaction.

Related: There is no doubt about it: Tony Blair was on the warpath from early 2002

Blair, who will be aware of what Sir John Chilcot is planning to say about him in the long-awaited report into the Iraq war, moved to pre-empt its criticisms in an interview with CNN. He told Zakaria: “I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong.

“I also apologise for some of the mistakes in planning and, certainly, our mistake in our understanding of what would happen once you removed the regime.”

But Blair made clear that he still felt he made the right decision in backing the US invasion of Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein. He said: “I find it hard to apologise for removing Saddam.”

Blair also made light of the claims that he should stand trial on war crimes charges and defended his policy of what he used to describe as liberal interventionism. He contrasted what he described as “my ‘crime’” – the removal of Saddam – and the civil war in Syria.

“We have stood back and we, in the west, bear responsibility for this – Europe most of all. We’ve done nothing. That’s a judgment of history I’m prepared to have.”

Blair indicated that he saw merit in the argument that the Iraq war was to blame for the rise of Islamic State (Isis). “I think there are elements of truth in that,” he said when asked whether the Iraq invasion had been the “principal cause” of the rise of Isis.

He added: “Of course you can’t say those of us who removed Saddam in 2003 bear no responsibility for the situation in 2015.”

Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish first minister, responded by saying that the “Blair spin operation” had swung into action as Chilcot prepares to set out a timetable for the publication of his report.

— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon)
The Blair spin operation begins but the country still awaits the truth. The delay to Chilcot report is a scandal. https://t.co/pPhRcZzGrc

Sturgeon tweeted: “The Blair spin operation begins but the country still awaits the truth. The delay to Chilcot report is a scandal.”

In his long-awaited report, Chilcot is expected to criticise the use of intelligence that suggested Hussein had weapons of mass destruction in the run-up to the Iraq war. The former Northern Ireland Office permanent secretary is also expected to say that the UK and the US failed to make adequate preparations for the aftermath of the invasion.

Blair’s office sought to downplay the significance of the CNN interview, part of a programme called Long Road to Hell: America in Iraq, to be broadcast on the network on Monday.

A spokeswoman said: “Tony Blair has always apologised for the intelligence being wrong and for mistakes in planning. He has always also said, and says again here, that he does not however think it was wrong to remove Saddam.”

Related: There is no doubt about it: Tony Blair was on the warpath from early 2002

She added: “He did not say the decision to remove Saddam in 2003 ‘caused Isis’ and pointed out that Isis was barely heard of at the end of 2008, when al-Qaida was basically beaten. He went on to say in 2009, Iraq was relatively more stable.

“What then happened was a combination of two things: there was a sectarian policy pursued by the government of Iraq, which were mistaken policies. But also when the Arab spring began, Isis moved from Iraq into Syria, built themselves from Syria and then came back into Iraq. All of this he has said before.”

Chilcot is preparing to outline a timetable for the publication of his report in the next 10 days. Blair will be aware of what criticisms Chilcot is planning to make of him because the inquiry chair has written to all key participants as part of what is known as the Maxwellisation process. It allows them to respond to criticisms before publication.

Chilcot was a member of the Butler inquiry, which in 2004 raised concerns about the intelligence before the Iraq invasion. The inquiry also questioned the way in which senior intelligence officials and Downing Street stripped out caveats from intelligence assessments.

Tony Blair makes qualified apology for Iraq war ahead of Chilcot report
by Nicholas Watt Chief political, theguardian.com

Read more from The Guardian

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/25/tony-blair-sorry-iraq-war-mistakes-admits-conflict-role-in-rise-of-isis

Islam under attack by modern time crusaders

Modern crusaders are using ISIS to not only harm Islam, but they are also fanning enmity against Muslim communities.
It is a fact that some Western circles wanting to finish off Islam are involved in an all-out campaign to not only harm Islam but to totally eradicate it. These are the modern day crusaders.

Today, Islam, a religion of peace, tranquility and security, is being portrayed as the cause of evil and terrorism.

You only have to look at the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) to see what this is all about. ISIS stands for everything that is un-Islamic. ISIS is trying to legitimize its atrocities and barbarism through Islam, which is simply a clear indicator of who ISIS is serving.

You only have to look at the bombing in Ankara last Saturday that killed about 100 people and wounded more than 200 to see what ISIS is capable of.

It is high time the Islamic scholars and wise men came together and started telling the world what true Islam is all about. Yet we see with sadness that Muslim scholars and men of wisdom are as bewildered as we are in the face of the assaults against Islam. We cannot see any meaningful dialogue among them. We do not see any form of meaningful cooperation among them. All we see is goodwill messages and well wishes.

You only have to look at the disasters that were suffered during the hajj in Mecca to see the Islamic world is still far from getting its act together. We need a concerted effort but the lack of spirit of solidarity during the hajj incidents show we still have a long way to go.

Islamophobia is not only threatening Islam but it is seriously harming Islamic communities in Western countries. The modern day crusaders are not only using ISIS to harm Islam but they are also fanning enmity against Islamic communities in Europe.

This is a wakeup call.

Turkey's DİB has been making an effort to get people to cooperate, force religious leaders of various countries to unite their forces and counter disgusting organizations like ISIS. But this needs a lot of effort and solidarity.

Mehmet Görmez, the head of the Presidency of Religious Affairs (DİB) inaugurated the Asia and Pacific Countries Muslim Religious Leaders Summit in Istanbul yesterday calling on the Muslims of the world to unite against the ongoing threats targeting Islam.
Let us hope the summit in Istanbul serves this purpose.

http://www.dailysabah.com/columns/ilnur-cevik/2015/10/14/islam-under-attack-by-modern-time-crusaders

Angola has officialy banned islam shuts down mosques: Is this the beginning?

Angola-Ban-Islam-Shuts-Down-Mosques

Angola president said: ‘This is the final end of Islamic influence in our country’ Islam as a ‘sect’ which is banned as counter to Angolan customs and culture.

Officials at the Angolan Embassy in Washington, D.C., denied Monday that the nation has banned Islam and dismantled mosques, disputing published news accounts and stating that they cannot authenticate comments reportedly made by top Angolan officials that support the claims.
Updates, latest news about Angola >>>>>>
A number of news outlets have reported that Angola has “banned” Islam and started to dismantle mosques in a bold effort to stem the spread of Muslim extremism.
Angola-Banned-Islam
Weekly French-language Moroccan newspaper La Nouvelle Tribune published an article on Friday sourcing “several” Angolan officials, including the Southwest African nation’s minister of culture, Rosa Cruz, who reportedly offered the following remarks, which have been translated from French: “The process of legalization of Islam has not been approved by the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights. Their mosques would be closed until further notice.”
African economic news agency Agence Ecofin wrote that Cruz made the statement at an appearance last week before the 6th Commission of the National Assembly. The website goes on to note that, “According to several Angolan newspapers, Angola has become the first country in the world to ban Islam and Muslims, taking first measures by destroying mosques in the country.”
Even Angola President José Eduardo dos Santos has weighed in on the controversy, as he was quoted in Nigeria’s Osun Defender newspaper on Sunday as saying, “This is the final end of Islamic influence in our country,” according to the OnIslam.net report.
The reported comments by Cruz and Santos echo the stance of the governor of the country’s Luanda province, Bento Francisco Bento, who reportedly maintains that “radical Muslims were not welcome in Angola and that the government was not ready to legalize the presence of mosques in the country,” according to a La Nouvelle Tribune summary of Bento’s take on the issue.
In a physical extension of the officials’ sentiments about Islam’s place in Angola, La Nouvelle Tribune said that a minaret of an Angolan mosque was dismantled last October, and that the city of Zango “has gone further by destroying the only mosque in the city.”

The emerging reports about Angola “banning” Islam and dismantling mosques point to the anti-Islam sentiments held by many in the nation’s citizens, but they could not immediately be independently verified by International Business Times.

Angola is a majority-Christian nation of about 16 million people, of whom an estimated 55 percent are Catholic, 25 percent belong to African Christian denominations, 10 percent follow major Protestant traditions, and 5 percent belong to Brazilian Evangelical churches. Only 80,000 to 90,000 Angolans are Muslim,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Britain's silence on Angola is deafening
Despite meeting all the criteria for a great news story, the British media ignore this oil-rich state. I blame our colonial history. Lara Pawson
Luanda angola
Oil-rich Luanda has been governed by the MPLA for 38 years. 
What do Britain's journalists look for in a story from the African continent? How about a 71-year-old dictator who's presided over an oil-rich country for 34 years, lining his family's pockets with billions of dollars, and who extinguishes his opponents by torturing them to death and feeding their bodies to crocodiles? It's almost too good to be true – a cliche of the African state to have foreign correspondents drooling. But despite possessing all the ingredients of a thoroughly gripping news story, British media interest in Angola's contemporary political stage remains close to zero.

Today, in the Angolan capital of Luanda, a funeral will be held for 28-year-old Manuel de Carvalho, known as Ganga, who was allegedly shot dead by the presidential guard on Saturday morning. Ganga had been distributing leaflets about the killing of two former Angolan soldiers, António Alves Kamulingue and Isaías Sebastião Cassule, who were abducted in May 2012 while organising a demonstration for war veterans demanding payment of their pensions. Information leaked last week to the independent news website Club-K revealed that the two former soldiers had been tortured in police custody before being killed. One of them was then thrown to crocodiles.

Hours after Ganga's death, hundreds of Angolans took to Luanda's streets in a demonstration organised by the main opposition party, Unita, to demand justice for the deaths of Kamulingue and Cassule. In response, armed police, supported by reinforcements in helicopters, used tear gas to break up the protest. Hundreds of people were arrested and at least one was shot and injured.

Appalled by the authorities' repeated use of excessive force, this weekend saw many Angolans, both at home and abroad, expressing their anger and also their shame. One Angolan suggested that the abbreviated name of the MPLA ruling party (Movimento Popular de Libertação de Angola) should now stand for Matamos o Povo que tenta Lutar pela liberdade de Angola (We Kill the People who try to Fight for the freedom of Angola).

From London, I spread word of the day's events, emailing my networks and engaging in the online debates. Later on Saturday evening, at a private view at the Victoria Miro gallery in one of London's most exclusive neighbourhoods, I reflected on the links between Britain and Angola, and on the chasm that distinguishes the ease of my daily life from that of my friends in Luanda.

Disco Angola is an exhibition of six photographs by the Canadian artist Stan Douglas. Posing as the work of a 1970s photojournalist, Douglas's series of staged images juxtapose New York's disco scene with the moment when Angola swivelled from liberation war to civil war. In A Luta Continua, 1974, a slender woman in a green T-shirt and flares stands in front of a brick building painted with the MPLA flag and its motto, "A Luta Continua, Vitória é Certa" (The fight continues, victory is certain). Sipping champagne, I grimaced at this idea of the MPLA, which began its life as a movement for the liberation of the people. I also grimaced at myself, nibbling canapes in Mayfair while pondering the miserable events in Luanda.

Coincidentally, it was at the gallery that I learned of the BBC's Reporting Africa seminar, which took place on Monday this week. Also dubbed the "impartiality seminar", the chairman of the BBC Trust, Lord Patten, invited informed and interested parties to give their views on whether the BBC's coverage of Africa is "duly impartial and reflects the full range of views and voices".

I've long moaned about the BBC's idea of Africa, and the way its star presenters tackle stories coming out of the vast, complex continent. But in the case of Angola – one of Africa's most significant economic and military players – the failure of the BBC has little to do with impartiality. Currently, there is no BBC reporter based in Angola at all. Two years ago, "as a result of cuts", it also closed down the Portuguese for Africa department. I've given up asking why, however I'm certain that our colonial history and our very British attitude to language remain influential: "Portuguese, isn't it?". Of course, if Saturday's events in Luanda had taken place in Harare, we'd never hear the end of it – and questions of impartiality might become more pertinent. For the time being, if Lord Patten is serious, he should put aside a salary for an Angola-based reporter to live and work in the country: not because it's an African country, but because of what is happening to the people who live there and what this may mean for one of the world's longest-serving rulers.
By Lara Pawson , theguardian.com
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/27/britain-angola-silence-british-media-colonial
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments/Appeal
Muslims should be patient, protest peacefully as solidarity with Muslims in Angola. Please protect Christians around you, they are blameless. Jesus Christ did not preach such things. 
Prophet Muhammad's Everlasting Promise to Christians:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
کیا آپ پاکستان کے حالات سے پریشان ہیں؟
 اپنے وطن کے لیے کچھ کرنا چاہتے ہیں؟
مزید اس لنک پر 
http://pakistan-posts.blogspot.com/2013/11/pakistan-basic-issues-need-immediate.html

If you are concerned about Pakistan and want to do some thing, find more at the link below:
http://peace-forum.blogspot.com/2013/11/pakistan-quagmire-basic-dialogue.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Related:
Free-eBooks: http://goo.gl/2xpiv
Peace-Forum Video Channel: http://goo.gl/GLh75

Muslim world in flames

FROM Pakistan to the Levant, the Muslim world is burning in a self-lift fire, the ‘confrontation without’ having given way to ‘a confrontation within’.

Beyond the Levant, as in North Africa, Maghreb and Muslim sub-Sahara, instability, violence and uncertainty reign. Political movements have turned religious, and the religious ones have degenerated into sectarian bloodbaths.
Hoisted by its own petard, Pakistan has a story to tell. Decades ago, nobody believed the militants tasked by America with defeating the Soviet Union in Afghanistan would one day become Pakistan’s most implacable foes, turn into sectarian hounds, demoralise the armed forces, and eat into its vitals.

In the Arab world, the fragrance of the Spring has turned into an overpowering stench enveloping the Fertile Crescent and its neighbourhood. As the phoney stability imposed by the dictators gave way to anarchy, the character of the Arab Spring changed.

Ben Ali, Hosni Mubarak, Ali Abdullah Saleh and Muammar Qadhafi fell — until the Spring attempted a blossoming in Syria. Suddenly, as Bashar al-Assad fought back to preserve the 40 years of dynastic rule, madness descended — and not only on the Syrians.

Within months, a power line-up had come into being, with nearly a dozen states and sanctimonious cults baying for Muslim blood.

These included Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Hezbollah, a bewildering variety of Al Qaeda factions, the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (into which Syria’s Jabhat al-Nusra merged), the newly formed Islamic Front, and last not but not least battle-hardened Pakistani Taliban — a reincarnation of Changez Khan’s bloodthirsty hordes, who gloried in tossing babies on lances.

Over 115,000 are dead, a vast majority of them Muslim. Watching in tension on the sidelines are Jordan and Turkey, both hosting Syrian refugees whose overall number has crossed two million.

This sectarian fire — this confrontation within — has replaced what until Anwar Saadat’s assassination was a confrontation without. Until that fateful October day, the eighth anniversary of the 1973 Ramazan war, when Nasser’s successor was gunned down, the Arab world appeared one monolithic unit.

It had no religion and no sect. Ruling the hearts and minds of the Arab people was the fervent nationalism unleashed by Gamal Abdel Nasser. The gradual erosion of this spirit of ‘confrontation without’ was a phenomenon not confined to the Arab world; it affected the landmass from Pakistan to Morocco. There were reasons why.

Giants Nasser, Faisal, Ben Bella, Boumediene and Bhutto were followed by midgets who considered the expedient American commitment to their tyranny an alternative to popular mandate.

Jerusalem, Iraq, Afghanistan, Gujarat, Sabra-Shatila, Bosnia, 9/11: the very dimensions of these challenges and humiliations were beyond their comprehension.

Afghanistan turned out to be a tragedy: it became the source of religious militancy for the Muslim world. Pakistan, of course, gets the blame, perhaps rightly, but let us note that the US-led West just walked off after the Soviet defeat, saddling Pakistan and the region with well-armed, uncontrollable jihadis euphoric over their triumph.

With the Left demoralised as the Soviet camp collapsed, it was the religious parties which filled the vacuum when the strongmen fell. The religious right had not been idle during these decades of dictatorship: it utilised this rights-less era by expanding community networks and earning the people’s gratitude.

In this category fell the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates in Egypt and the Maghreb; and the Jamaat-i-Islami in Pakistan. No wonder, the religious parties today occupy centre stage in this intra-Muslim conflagration that shows no signs of dying out.

The jihadis have now virtually abandoned the cause of Muslims under foreign occupation, except as catchy shibboleths. Their principal enemies now are fellow Muslims and the minorities. This fixation on a self-invented enemy within the Muslim milieu reflects an inquisitionist credo of basically sick minds.

In Pakistan, the Taliban are massacring Shias; in the Levant, non-Syrian Sunni militias and Hezbollah have turned the anti-Baathist struggle for democratic rights into a sectarian strife; in Bahrain, Saudi troops are helping the Sunni monarchy crush the Shia rebellion; Iraq is witnessing a throwback to the 2006 sectarian conflict with fatalities this year close to 6,000, and Riyadh is as much concerned over Iran’s nuclear quest as Tel Aviv.

Here we can see two incompatible phenomena: Muslim governments’ anxiety to safeguard their national interests and the international jihadi fraternity’s cold-blooded indifference to Muslim states’ geopolitical concerns.

This disregard for state interests stems from the militants’ quizzical contention that Islam doesn’t believe in nation-states. The absurdity of the practical implications of this theory was acknowledged by Maulana Maudoodi when he gave up this ‘Trotskyite’ belief and headed for Pakistan to set up an Islamic state.

No wonder, extraterritorial loyalties are ingrained in Pakistani Islamists’ theory and practice, as reflected in Syed Munawwar Hassan’s conferment of shahadat on a man who was supreme commander of a rebel army which was, and is, at war with the state of Pakistan. Notice that Chinese have been a major target for the Taliban and Lal Masjid rebels.

Rawalpindi on Ashura was symptomatic of what ails the Muslim world. Worldwide, the Islamists could have advanced their cause by democratic means. They had the means to influence people. That — unknown to Imran Khan — they should massacre their own people is a tragedy for the Muslim world.

They are destroying what potentially could have been the bastion of their power. The anarchy now reigning in the Muslim heartland has made the suffering people develop nostalgia for the ousted tyrants.

With Syria’s chemical weapons confiscated, the UN has no interest in peace in the Levant. So brother Muslims are welcome to keep fighting till hell freezes over.

BY MUHAMMAD ALI SIDDIQI
http://www.dawn.com/news/1058902/muslim-world-is-burning
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Angola bans Islam and shuts down all mosques across the country because it 'clashes with state religion of Christianity'
Minister of culture described Islam as a 'sect' which is banned as counter to Angolan customs and culture
Nation's president said: ‘This is the final end of Islamic influence in our country'

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
کیا آپ پاکستان کے حالات سے پریشان ہیں؟
 اپنے پیارے وطن کے لیے کچھ کرنا چاہتے ہیں؟
مزید اس لنک پر 
http://pakistan-posts.blogspot.com/2013/11/pakistan-basic-issues-need-immediate.html

If you are concerned about Pakistan and want to do some thing, find more at the link below:
http://peace-forum.blogspot.com/2013/11/pakistan-quagmire-basic-dialogue.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Related:
Free-eBooks: http://goo.gl/2xpiv
Peace-Forum Video Channel: http://goo.gl/GLh75

US Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield

File:Dirty Wars film poster.jpg
Dirty Wars describes how, in the words of author Jeremy Scahill, “the United States came to embrace assassination as a central part of its national security policy.” In Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield, Scahill, correspondent for The Nation magazine (US), and author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army, provides a fresh perspective on the so-called ‘war on terror’ that rises above mainstream punditry.
Scahill tracks the dramatic rise of US covert operations without legislative oversight, kill lists that keep being added to, American support for the full gamut of mercenaries — Somali warlords, Yemeni tribal leaders, security contractors — and the escalation of wanton aerial strikes. These covert operations result in a de facto trashing of international law and the American Constitution by the very people tasked with upholding them; in Dirty Wars, the ‘war on terror’ appears less a mediated, measured multilateral effort to make the world a safer place, and more a reckless campaign by an international criminal syndicate whose grossly excessive use of violence creates a blowback against the United States and the people, institutions and states around the world seen to be allied with the US. Assassinations, civilian casualties, renditions, torture — all are reported in Dirty Wars by the spadefull. And it’s not a pretty picture.

But first, a disclaimer: For most, Dirty Wars shall not lead to entirely new insights (especially in Pakistan where drone attacks are rooted at the heart of the right-of-centre political discourse). Most readers shall already be familiar with many of the events in the book. Still, Scahill makes two contributions to reporting on the global wars since 9/11: (1) he shifts the emphasis from conventional military campaigns to covert operations run by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and more ominously, the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) that is directly under the American presidency and not subject to political oversight like the CIA is in principle; and, (2) Scahill weaves together different stories that take the reader from the corridors of power in Washington to the mosques of suburban Virginia, to Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen, and to a lesser extent, Pakistan. Indeed, besides personal interviews — wide-ranging as they are — Scahill’s sources are all in the public domain (there are 80 pages of endnotes for the skeptics). Dirty Wars is not without its share of shortcomings, both conceptual and stylistic — more on that later — but overall, it remains focused on extra-judicial killings and the exercise of power sans political oversight.

Amidst the carefully reconstructed processes detailing the empowerment of US special forces (including security contractors), and elaborate descriptions of US clientalism in Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan, Dirty Wars keeps returning to the thorny questions of whether the US president can order the assassination of an American citizen without trial. Scahill tracks three American-born citizens who were killed by drone strikes in Yemen in 2011: Anwar Awlaki, his 16-year-old son Abdulrahman Awlaki (killed in a separate drone strike some days later), and Samir Khan, who was killed with the elder Awlaki. Anwar Awlaki is, in fact, the central figure around which Dirty Wars moves (chapters on Awlaki are interspersed throughout the book). Scahill doesn’t so much take a categorical position on whether the strikes were or were not illegal; rather, his answer lies in the exposition of how assassination became standard operating procedure in the ‘war on terror’ after 9/11.

Broadly, the story goes like this: The 9/11 attacks gave neoconservatives in the Bush administration — Dick Cheney, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz — the opportunity to finally pursue an assertive foreign policy that they had been wistfully dreaming of; indeed, all through the Clinton administration, right-wing think tanks had been bemoaning the lack of assertiveness in US foreign policy since the Cold War. Following the attacks on New York and Washington, the US Congress and Senate, reeling from the recent events, didn’t think twice about giving the US president unprecedented latitude to wage a global war. In a vote on September 14, 2001, the House and Senate passed the Authorisation for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that allowed the president to “use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, persons, organisations he determines planned, authorised, committed or aided the terrorist attacks.” The one dissenting vote was of California Democrat Barbara Lee, whose concerns with granting the president unprecedented authority today appears prophetic. Calling for a need to “step back for a moment and think through the implications of our actions,” Lee cautioned that “we must be careful not to embark on an open-ended war with neither an exit strategy nor a focused target.” Lee’s caution was diametrically opposite to the view of Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld who in their public statements after 9/11 relished the prospect of a shadowy war without exit strategies. The signing of the AUMF into law on September 17 undid the National Security Act of 1947, which had required the US president to issue a finding before undertaking covert action, and which had also demanded that such covert action be in compliance with the US law and Constitution. Such procedural matters could now be bypassed, especially in the “unleashing” of the deadly JSOC by Rumsfeld — described by Scahill as “America’s best killers” — and the “assumption of presidential power” by vice-president Dick Cheney, both of whom were against congressional oversight of covert operations.

The first clear indication of new directions in the global war was the assassination, in 2002, of Abu Ali al Harithi, identified as the mastermind behind the year-2000 USS Cole bombing. Killed in Yemen by a US Predator drone flown out of Djibouti, Harithi was the first confirmed citizen killed outside of a battlefield since Gerald Ford’s ban on political assassinations in 1976. This was also the first time that a Predator drone had been used to strike targets outside of Afghanistan and would pave the way for a sharp escalation in drone strikes under the presidency of Barack Obama.
By HASAN H. KARRAR: http://www.dawn.com/news/1056556/cover-story-dirty-wars-the-world-is-a-battlefield
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Wars
Videos >>>>
  1. Jeremy Scahill on Democracy Now! - Dirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield [Both parts in one] - YouTube

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWqQNG03MhU
    Apr 29, 2013 - Uploaded by CryingWolf57
    Dirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield [Both parts in one] ... The book is based on years of reporting on U.S. secret operations in Yemen, Somalia  ...
Related:
Free-eBooks: http://goo.gl/2xpiv
Peace-Forum Video Channel: http://goo.gl/GLh75

US drones in Pakistan may be war crime !

Lawyers for Pakistani man whose father was killed by drone strike seek to have sharing of UK intelligence declared unlawful. The British government's support for US drone operations over Pakistan may involve acts of assisting murder or even war crimes, the high court heard on Tuesday.

In the first serious legal challenge in the English courts to the drones campaign, lawyers for a young Pakistani man whose father was killed by a strike from an unmanned aircraft are seeking to have the sharing of UK locational intelligence declared unlawful.

Noor Khan, 27, is said to live in constant fear of a repeat of the attack in North Waziristan in March last year that killed more than 40 other people, who are said to have gathered to discuss a local mining dispute.

The British government has declined to state whether or not its signals intelligence agency GCHQ passes information in support of the CIA drone operations over Pakistan, although the court heard that media reports suggest that it does.

The case opened as the RAF confirmed that it is to double the number of its own drones flying combat and surveillance operations over Afghanistan. The five additional aircraft will be operated from the UK for the first time, rather than the US. The UK's existing Reaper drones, which are used to target suspected insurgents in Helmand province, have been operated from Creech air force base in Nevada because the RAF has not had the capability to fly them from Britain.

Martin Chamberlain, counsel for Khan, said that a newspaper article in 2010 had reported that GCHQ was using telephone intercepts to provide the US authorities with locational intelligence on leading militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The report suggested that the Cheltenham-based agency was proud of this work, which was said to be "in strict accordance with the law".

On the contrary, Chamberlain said, any GCHQ official who passed locational intelligence to the CIA knowing or believing that it could be used to facilitate a drone strike would be committing a serious criminal offence.

"The participation of a UK intelligence official in US drone strikes, by passing intelligence, may amount to the offence of encouraging or assisting murder," he said. Alternatively, it could amount to a war crime or a crime against humanity, he added.

Chamberlain said that no GCHQ official would be able to mount a defence of combat immunity, but added that there was no wish in this case to convict any individual of a criminal offence. Rather, Khan was seeking a declaration by the civil courts that such intelligence-sharing is unlawful.

Between June 2004 and September this year, according to research by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, drone strikes killed between 2,562 and 3,325 people in Pakistan, of whom between 474 and 881 were civilians, including 176 children.

With the number of drone strikes increasing sharply under the Obama administration, the London case is one of several being brought by legal activists around the world in an attempt to challenge their legality of the programme.

In Pakistan, lawyers and human rights activists are mounting two separate court claims: one is intended to trigger a criminal investigation into the actions of two former CIA officials, while the second is seeking a declaration that the strikes amount to acts of war, in order to pressurise the Pakistani air force into shooting down drones operating in the country's airspace.

During the two-day hearing in London, lawyers for Khan are seeking permission for a full judicial review of the lawfulness of any British assistance for the US drone programme.

Lawyers for William Hague, the foreign secretary, say not only that they will neither confirm nor deny any intelligence-sharing activities in support of drone operations, but that it would be "prejudicial to the national interest" for them even to explain their understanding of the legal basis for any such activities.

For Khan and his lawyers to succeed, they say, the court would need to be satisfied that there is no international armed conflict in Pakistan, with the result that anyone involved in drone strikes was not immune from the criminal law, and that there had been no tacit approval for the strikes from the Pakistan government – another matter that the British government will neither confirm nor deny.

The court would also need to consider, and reject, the US government's own legal position: that drone strikes are acts of self-defence. It would also need to be satisfied that the handing over of intelligence amounted to participation in hostilities.

The government also says that Khan's claim would have a "significant impact" on the conduct of the UK's relations with both the US and Pakistan in an "acutely controversial, sensitive and important" area, and also impact on relations between the US and Pakistan.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/23/uk-support-us-drones-pakistan-war-crime
Related:
A new report from the Conflict Monitoring Centre (CMC) has reported that 2,043 Pakistanis have been slain in CIA drone strikes in the past 5 years, with the vast majority of them innocent civilians. The report notes that the ...
Free-eBooks: http://goo.gl/2xpiv
Peace-Forum Video Channel: http://goo.gl/GLh75

West, Breeding Ground for Terrorism

Powered by Peace-Forum
Let’s make no bones about it, the menacing threat of ‘nuclear terrorism’ does not come from some ruthless jihadist cluster, but from the hard-nosed Western nuclear powers who form the core of the NATO alliance, and keeping intimidating and threatening the non nuclear weapon states.

The history of US imperialism is replete with stories of unilateral belligerent military strikes, gory massacres and socio-cultural aggression. In this no-holds-barred brinkmanship, the US and its allies have sought to impose their writ on other nations, more so on those who have refused to swear allegiance to Uncle Sam’s hegemony. The blatant war-mongering and sinister desire to inflict suffering on others is best explained by these words of American writer Andre Vltchek.

“West has always behaved as if it had an inherited, but undefined, right to profit from the misery of the rest of the world. In many cases, the conquered nations had to give up their own culture, their religions, even their languages, and convert to our set of beliefs and values that we define as ‘civilized’.

Guatemala Civil War that continued from 1960 to 1996 was bitterly fought between the government of Guatemala and ethnic Mayans, in which the government of Guatemala committed worst human rights abuses and engineered genocide of Mayan population of Guatemala. Historical Clarification Commission set up under the Oslo Accords of 1994 concluded that the Guatemala military committed murder, torture and rape with the tacit support of CIA. The commission stated the “government of the United States, through various agencies including the CIA, provided direct and indirect support for some state operations.” Noam Chomsky in his book What Uncle Sam Really Wants writes, “Under Reagan, support for near-genocide in Guatemala became positively ecstatic. The most extreme of the Guatemalan Hitlers we’ve backed there, Rios Montt, was lauded by Reagan as a man totally dedicated to democracy. In the early 1980s, Washington’s friends slaughtered tens of thousands of Guatemalans, mostly Indians in the highlands, with countless others tortured and raped. Large regions were decimated.”

Vietnam:
Direct or indirect support for death squads has been an integral part of CIA operations. CIA’s death squad operations in Vietnam led to killing of over 35,000 people. The Vietnam War dominated 30 long years of Vietnam’s history from 1940s to 1970s. President Ford, reacting to Senate and House committee reports, conceded that the CIA had become a ‘rogue elephant’ crushing foreign citizens under foot in its bid to win the Cold War. More than 20,000 Vietnamese were killed during the CIA-guided Operation Phoenix intended to weed out communist ‘agents’ from South Vietnam.

Salvador:
American role in the violent overthrow of the democratically-elected Popular Unity government of Salvador in 1980s was a watershed moment for the country. Bush family loyalists maintain that President Bush senior’s policies paved the way for peace, turning Salvador into a democratic success story. However, it took more than 70,000 deaths and grave human rights violations, before peace was brokered. To crush the rebels, the US trained an army that kidnapped and killed more than 30,000 people, and presided over large-scale massacre of old, women and children.

In the mid-1970s, a major scandal broke out after revelations that President Richard Nixon had ordered the CIA to ‘make the economy scream’ in Chile and to prevent Allende from coming to power. Years later, CIA acknowledged its deep involvement in Chile where it dealt with coup-plotters, false propagandists and assassins. In a review of Lubna Qureshi’s book Nixon, Kissinger, and Allende: US Involvement in the 1973 Coup in Chile, Howard Doughty writes, “The United States and its allies have an unseemly history of hostility to democracy abroad that seems to conflict with their expressed political principles and their stated purpose in engaging in military and diplomatic action abroad. Not only in Latin America, but in Africa, Asia and occasionally in Europe, it has openly and clandestinely supported dictatorships.”

The US government’s cozy relationship with its illegitimate offspring Israel is no secret. It has paid Israel almost one hundred billion dollars over the years, major part of which is used for occupying Palestinian territories, in blatant breach of international laws and umpteen UN resolutions. Veteran Middle East reporter Robert Fisk draws parallels between Israel and apartheid regime of South Africa. “No matter how many youths are shot dead by the Israelis, no matter how many murders and no matter how bloody the reputation of the Israeli Prime Minister, we are reporting this terrible conflict as if we supported the South African whites against the blacks.”

Likewise, Columbia, arguably one of the most violent countries in the world, is the beneficiary of massive US aid. Some political observers like Professor John Barry are of the opinion that US influence has only managed to catalyze internal conflicts and substantially expand the scope and nature of human rights abuses in Colombia. And ironically, most American people remain naïve about the shady role of their country in Colombia’s historical development and the unremitting violence.

Chile:
In Cuba, America’s record is again appalling. It has been involved in attempted assassinations of state heads, bombings, military invasions, crippling sanctions et al. And, recent reports suggest that the US government’s covert attack on Cuba’s sovereignty continues unabated. Even after half a century, economic blockade remains in force. The country has been designated a ‘terrorist state’, figuring prominently on the State Department’s list of ‘State Sponsors of Terrorism’. The five Cuban political prisoners are still behind bars. Now a report from the US General Accounting Office reveals that money is being pumped into projects directed at changing Cuba’s government.

Contra terrorists in Nicaragua:
Washington’s support for the Contra terrorists in Nicaragua between 1981 and 1990 is one of the most shocking and shameful secrets. The heinous terrorist activities contras engaged in had full backing of their masters in Washington. “The decision of the International Court of Justice in June 1986 condemning the United States for the ‘unlawful use of force’ and illegal economic warfare was dismissed as an irrelevant pronouncement by a ‘hostile forum’,” notes Noam Chomsky in Western State Terrorism. “The guiding principle, it appears, is that the US is a lawless terrorist state and this is right and just, whatever the world may think, whatever international institutions may declare.”

Lebanon:
On March 8, 1985, in an assassination bid on Sheikh Mohammed Fazlullah by CIA, a powerful car bomb exploded outside a Beirut mosque in Lebanon, leaving 81 civilians dead. Celebrated investigative reporter Bob Woodward says that CIA director William Casey had admitted personal culpability in the attack while he lay on his deathbed, which he said was carried out with funding from Saudi Arabia. In December 1989, almost 27,000 US soldiers invaded a small Central American country of Panama to arrest General Manuel Noriega, a CIA asset-turned-rebel. In the ‘Operation Just Cause’, bombs rained down on three neighborhoods – Colon, San Miguelito and El Chorrillo. El Chorrillo was burnt to the ground and got a new nickname – ‘Little Hiroshima’. As per conservative estimates, between 2,000 and 6,000 people were killed in the events that unfolded. Many of them were dumped into mass graves.

Congo has been through violent times since its independence. Many observers trace it to the murder of Patrice Lumumba, the first prime minister of independent Congo, which was apparently done at the behest by the then U.S. President Eisenhower. In Haiti, the U.S. backed the Duvalier family dictatorship for 30 years, during which the CIA worked closely with death squads, executioners, and drug traffickers. The father-son duo’s three decades at helm was marked by brutally crushing dissent with the assistance of secret police and the Haitian army. Thousands were killed and tortured – many of them dumped in mass graves. Hundreds of thousands fled the country to escape from mindless violence.

The 1983 invasion of Grenada was the first major American military assault since Vietnam War. The news was blocked as the US government didn’t want the world to witness the great superpower bashing up a small island nation. Why did the United States invade Grenada? “Many believe that Grenada was seen as a bad example for other poor Caribbean states,” opines Stephen Zunes, author of Tinderbox: US Middle East Policy and the Roots of Terrorism. “Its foreign policy was not subservient to the American government and it was not open to having its economy dominated by U.S. corporate interests.”

In Greece, America supported a coup against an elected leader George Papandreou, which followed the years of murder, torture, and fear in the late 1960s. In Cambodia, the US resorted to carpet bombing to overthrow President Prince Sihanouk, who was replaced by Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge and that led to millions of civilian casualties between mid 1950s and 1970s. In 1965, which New York Times called ‘one of the most savage mass slayings of modern political history’, US embassy had compiled lists of ‘Communist’ operatives in Indonesia, from top echelons down to village cadres, as many as 5,000 names, and handed them over to the army, which then hunted them down and killed.

Between 1946 and 1958, the US used the Marshall Islands to conduct nuclear tests. All the inhabitants had to flee their homes. It is still not safe to consume food grown there. In the words of Robert Alvarez, “the people of the Marshall Islands had their homeland and health sacrificed for the national security interests of the United States”.

The nuclear attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 remain the darkest chapter of history. Almost 150,000 people paid for their lives instantly, while millions more died of radiation poisoning later. Truman ordered the atom bomb dropped on Hiroshima on August 6, followed by a plutonium bomb on Nagasaki on August 9. The same day, the Soviet Union attacked the Japanese and, in the following two weeks 84,000 Japanese were killed.
Iran:
Back in 1953, a joint British-American operation toppled the democratic government chosen by the Iranian parliament, and installed their loyal dictator. The coup restored the Shah to absolute power, initiating a period of 25 years of repression and torture, while the oil industry was restored to foreign ownership, with the US and Britain each getting 40 percent. That was before Ayatullah Khomeini mobilized masses and threw out the Western puppet.

Marjorie Cohn, a professor of international law, in an article written in November 2001 maintained that the bombings of Afghanistan by the United States were illegal. His argument was based on the premise that, according to UN Charter, disputes have to be brought to the UN Security Council, which alone may authorize the use of force. Also, if your nation has been subjected to an armed attack by another nation, you may respond militarily in self-defense. Afghanistan did not attack the United States. Indeed, the 19 men charged with the crime were not Afghans. Twelve years down the line, the foreign military troops are still stationed in Afghanistan, hundreds of billion dollars have been spent, and at least 31,000 people in Afghanistan (civilians, insurgents, Afghan military forces, and others) have been killed in the war.


The myth of the “outside enemy” and the threat of “Islamic terrorists” was the cornerstone of the Bush administration’s military doctrine, used as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, writes Michel Chossudovsky, author of The Globalisation of Poverty. More than a decade after US invaded Iraq, it’s still not clear why they did it. But it’s a fact, even acknowledged by the western media, that the war for Iraq was a war for oil. “Before the 2003 invasion, Iraq’s domestic oil industry was fully nationalized and closed to Western oil companies. A decade of war later, it is largely privatized and utterly dominated by foreign firms,” reads a CNN report








There is this concept of ‘good terrorism’ and ‘bad terrorism’. For the US and its closest ally Israel, the Tunis bombing was not an act of terror but justifiable retaliation for the murder of three Israelis in Cyprus. The 1985 Iron Fist operation of the Israeli army in southern Lebanon was also guided by the same logic. “From 1945 to the end of the 20th century, the USA attempted to overthrow more than 40 foreign governments, and to crush more than 30 populist-nationalist movements struggling against intolerable regimes. In the process, the USA caused the end of life for several million people, and condemned many millions more to a life of agony and despair,” writes William Blum in his book Rogue State. It will not qualify as ‘terrorism’ because the perpetrator is the world’s only super-power. In a 1986 interview, Noam Chomsky argued that the word “terrorism” had been redefined in political and popular discourse to only refer to the violent acts of small or marginal groups – what he refers to as “retail terrorism”. This is in contrast with violent acts performed by the State in its own interest which orthodox terrorism studies often exclude from consideration.

The political leaders and scholars in Muslim countries have to muster courage to condemn the so-called ‘good’ terrorism spearheaded by US and its allies like Britain, Israel, France. On May 09 this year, Iran’s parliament speaker Ali Larijani took the lead, blaming the West for spreading terrorism across Asia, and warning that the policy will ultimately backfire. “This evil phenomenon is the gift of the West to the region, but nurturing terrorist and extremist groups is bad and worrying even for the future of Western countries, notably the United States,” said Larijani.

Today, the war drums are beating again, and this time the target is Syria. “By ordering air strikes against Syria without UN Security Council support, Obama will be doing the same as Bush in 2003,” writes Hans Blix, Swedish diplomat and politician. Blix was the head of United Nations monitoring, verification and inspection commission from March 2000 to June 2003, which searched Iraq for weapons of mass destruction, ultimately finding none.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/west-breeding-ground-for-terrorism/5349739?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=west-breeding-ground-for-terrorism

Related:
Free-eBooks: http://goo.gl/2xpiv
Peace-Forum Video Channel: http://goo.gl/GLh75

Open Letter to Egyptian General Abdul Fatah Saeed Hussein Khalil Al-Sisi ( عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي‎

يرجى التوقف عن هذه المجزرة والإبادة الجماعية من مواطنيكم.لا تتصرف وكأنها أداة من الصهاينة، الامبريالية الامريكية.
إذا كان لديك الشجاعة وجه الصهاينة قتل الفلسطينيين الأبرياء.
ان التاريخ لن يغفر لك. كل الناس المتعطشين إلى السلطة في جميع أنحاء سوف تتخلى عنكم آل ساسي ......

Please stop this massacre, genocide of your countrymen.
Do not behave like a tool of Zionists, US imperialists.
If you have courage face Zionists killing innocent Palestinians.
History will never forgive you. All power hungry people around will abandon you Al-Sasi ......

~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Also Applicable to All kings and dictators  
رسالة مفتوحة إلى المشير ، الحاكم الجديد لمصر
كما ينطبق على جميع الملوك والحكام المستبدين

 The lesson of history is that people are always used by upper classes in case of revolution or resistance movements but never allowed to benefit from the shift of power that takes place as a result of their sacrifices. .. 

إن الدرس المستفاد من التاريخ هو أن الناس دائما ما تستخدم من قبل الطبقات العليا في حالة من حركات المقاومة الثورية ولكن لم يسمح للاستفادة من التحول من الطاقة الذي يحدث نتيجة لتضحياتهم 
الجنرال عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي بدلا من مساعدة الرئيس المنتخب مرسي، تمت إزالة لسوء الحظ له بشكل غير دستوري، مما أدى إلى سفك الدماء وعدم الاستقرار في مصر الذي هو لارضاء أعداء مصر والإسلام. . .. 


 General Abdul Fatah Saeed Hussein Khalil Al-Sisi ( عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي‎;) instead of assisting  the elected President Morsi, has unfortunately removed him unconstitutionally, resulting in to bloodshed and instability in Egypt which is pleasing to enemies of Egypt and Islam.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dear General Abdul Fatah Saeed Hussein Khalil Al-Sisi,


 

عزيزي عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي


Salam, Greetings of Peace,

سلام ، تحية للسلام

You have taken over reign of power in Egypt, the GREAT NATION and Civilization at a crucial time.
"وقد اتخذت لك أكثر من عهد السلطة في مصر ، وأمة عظيمة وحضارة في وقت حاسم

Now its up to you if you would like to be remembered in history like George Washington, De Gaul, Saladin or just an other Husni Mubarak, Pharaoh or alike. 

"الآن لتصل إلى ما إذا كنت ترغب في أن نتذكر في التاريخ مثل جورج واشنطن دي صلاح الدين فرنسي أو مجرد الأخرى حسني مبارك أو فرعون أو على حد سواء."

Remember no one rules or lives for ever.

تذكر أية قواعد أو حياة واحدة إلى الأبد."
"Everyone is bound to taste death and you shall receive your full reward on the Day of Resurrection. Then, whoever is spared the Fire and is admitted to Paradise has indeed been successful. The life of this world is merely an illusory enjoyment."(Qur'an;3:185)
Best Wishes,
طيب التمنيات
Friend and well wisher of Oppressed People 
صديق ويتمنى الخير للشعوب المضطهدة
الترجمة العربية من قبل جوجل"
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"جورج واشنطن (22 فبراير 1732 -- 14 ديسمبر 1799) : كان الزعيم العسكري والسياسي السائد في الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية الجديدة 1775-1799. قاد الانتصار الأمريكي على بريطانيا في الحرب الثورية الأميركية بصفته قائدا للجيش القاري في 1775-1783 ، وترأس في كتابة الدستور في 1787. كخيار بالإجماع لتكون بمثابة أول رئيس للولايات المتحدة (1789-1797) ، وقد ظهرت عليه أشكال وطقوس الحكومة التي استخدمت منذ ذلك الحين ، مثل استخدام نظام مجلس الوزراء ، والقاء كلمة الافتتاح. رئيسا بنى قوية وحكومة وطنية ممولة جيدا أن تجنب الحرب والتمرد قمع وفاز القبول بين الامريكيين من جميع الأنواع ، وكما هو معروف الآن واشنطن باسم \"أب وطنه\"."
George Washington (February 22, 1732 – December 14, 1799): He was the dominant military and political leader of the new United States of America from 1775 to 1799. He led the American victory over Britain in the American Revolutionary War as commander in chief of the Continental Army in 1775–1783, and he presided over the writing of the Constitution in 1787. As the unanimous choice to serve as the first President of the United States (1789–1797), he developed the forms and rituals of government that have been used ever since, such as using a cabinet system and delivering an inaugural address. As President he built a strong, well-financed national government that avoided war, suppressed rebellion and won acceptance among Americans of all types, and Washington is now known as the "Father of his country".


"وكان جنرال فرنسي ورجل دولة الذي قاد القوات الفرنسية الحرة خلال الحرب العالمية الثانية -- شارل أندريه جوزيف ماري ديغول [9 نوفمبر 1970 22 نوفمبر 1890]. كان قد أسسها في وقت لاحق الجمهورية الفرنسية الخامسة في عام 1958 وشغل منصب أول رئيس له من 1959 إلى 1969.De غول قاد كتابة دستور جديد مؤسس الجمهورية الخامسة ، وانتخب رئيسا لفرنسا ، وهو المكتب الذي عقد الآن قوة أكبر بكثير من في الجمهوريات الثالث والرابع. رئيسا ، وانتهت شارل ديغول الفوضى السياسية التي سبقت عودته الى  يعتبر العديد من المراقبين أن الزعيم الأكثر نفوذا في التاريخ الفرنسي الحديث."
Charles André Joseph Marie de Gaulle [22 November 1890 – 9 November 1970] was a French general and statesman who led the Free French Forces during World War II. He later founded the French Fifth Republic in 1958 and served as its first President from 1959 to 1969.De Gaulle led the writing of a new constitution founding the Fifth Republic, and was elected President of France, an office which now held much greater power than in the Third and Fourth Republics. As President, Charles de Gaulle ended the political chaos that preceded his return to power.He is considered by many to be the most influential leader in modern French history.
"صلاح الدين :\nفي هذه الحقبة من الاضطراب ، والتطرف الديني والأمتعة الشخصية مثل صلاح الدين الأيوبي ، يرمز احترام حقوق الإنسان والتسامح والرحمة والتقوى شجاعة. صلاح الدين الأيوبي [صلاح بن يوسف الدين أيوب ، 1137-1138 ولدت وتكريت وتوفي بلاد ما بين النهرين 4 مارس 1193 ، دمشق ، سوريا] أصبح سلطان مصر وسوريا واليمن ، وفلسطين ، ومؤسس الأسرة الأيوبية. في 1171 ألغى الفنار ʿ شي الخلافة الفاطمية ، وأعلن العودة إلى الإسلام السني في مصر.""كما سلطان مصر وسوريا ، ونجح في توحيد مصر وسوريا وبلاد ما بين النهرين الشمالية ، وفلسطين. سمعته كحاكم الفاضلة الكريمة ولكن شركة أذكت مسلم مقاومة الحروب الصليبية. في 1187 ، وتحول كامل قوته ضد الولايات الصليبية اللاتينية ، والقبض عليه القدس ، التي كانت في أيدي المسيحيين عن 88 عاما. في حين اتسمت الفتح المسيحي من قبل الذبح ، وأثبتت قوات صلاح الدين سلوك مهذب ومتحضر. انتصاره بصدمة عميقة الغرب وأدت إلى الدعوة إلى الحملة الصليبية الثالثة (1189-92) ، الذي يقابل به ضد ريتشارد الأول (قلب الأسد) ؛ أدى الجمود في سلام التي منحت للصليبيين سوى قطاع صغير من الأرض من صور ليافا (يافا). كثير من المسلمين يعتبرون صلاح الدين الأيوبي نموذج الحاكم تقيا وفاضلا. [المصدر موسوعة بريتانيكا]"
الترجمة العربية من قبل جوجل"
Saladin:
In this era of turmoil, and religious extremism the personalties like Saladin,  symbolize respect of human rights, tolerance, compassion  piety and bravery. Saladin [Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn Yūsuf ibn Ayyūb,  born 1137/38, Tikrīt, Mesopotamia died March 4, 1193, Damascus, Syria] became Sultan of Egypt, Syria, Yemen, and Palestine and founder of the Ayyūbid dynasty.   In 1171 he abolished the Shīʿite Fāṭimid caliphate and announced a return to Sunnite Islam in Egypt. From 1174, as sultan of Egypt and Syria, he succeeded in uniting Egypt, Syria, northern Mesopotamia, and Palestine. His reputation as a generous and virtuous but firm ruler rekindled Muslim resistance to the Crusades. In 1187, turning his full strength against the Latin Crusader states, he captured Jerusalem, which had been in Christian hands for 88 years. Whereas the Christian conquest had been marked by slaughter, Saladin’s troops demonstrated courteous and civilized behaviour. His victory deeply shocked the West and led to the call for the Third Crusade (1189–92), which matched him against Richard I (the Lionheart); their stalemate resulted in a peace that gave the Crusaders only a small strip of land from Tyre to Yafo (Jaffa). Many Muslims consider Saladin the paradigm of the pious and virtuous ruler.[Source Encyclopedia Britannica]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More at >>> 
Even after 200 years, the French Revolution continues to fascinate societies where people are deprived of their fundamental rights and basic needs, like education and health. It may horrify the rich and privileged who ...
 http://peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypt-journey-to-democracy-and-freedom.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"قراءة المزيد باللغة العربية عن طريق النقر على الروابط التالية على شبكة الإنترنت"
"مصر -- السعي من أجل الديمقراطية والسلام والحرية # 130211"
موجز تويت ، وصلات المشاركات 
"اضغط هنا لقراءة باللغة العربية"
  1. رسالة مفتوحة إلى حاكم المصرية الجديدة ، حقل المشير محمد حسين طنطا ...   peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/open-l...
  2. مصر في طريقها الى البحث عن مصيره   peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypt-...
  3. الغرب إلى الدين مصر   peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/wests-...
  4. الشباب المصري إلى الطاغية القسري عن طريق الوسائل السلمية...   peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypti...
  5. المصري تغيير : تافه دور الإسلاميين وكريستي القبطية... peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/insign...  
  1. ديكتاتور جديد مصر : طنطاوي وقال الوزير أن جورج واشنطن دي أو فرنسي من مصر أو مجرد الأخرى حسني مبارك؟...   peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/new-st...
  2. اجبرت على الخروج عن طريق الوسائل السلمية طاغية... منتدى شباب السلام جوهر تويت : المصري  peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypti...
  3. الإخوة والأخوات المصريين كنت صنع التاريخ ، وديمقراطية جديدة الشرق الأوسط ، في بداياته ، اضغط على توطيد المكاسب الثابت ، وأعداء ووتش
  4. الإخوة والأخوات المصريين صنع التاريخ ، وديمقراطية جديدة الشرق الأوسط ، في بداياته ، اضغط على توطيد المكاسب الثابت ، وأعداء ووتش
  5. الآن لدينا للتخلص من المافيا مزدحم في نهب البلد ، ، ، نحتاج إلى الديمقراطية الحقيقية.....
  6. المصري احتجاجات من أجل الديمقراطية : هل العسكرية... peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypti...
  7. حلفاء جدد اسرائيل ؟ وسوف اسرائيل حتى تصبح مزيد من العزلة؟ كيف سيؤثر هذا على عملية السلام؟peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/new-al...
  8. من يخاف من الاخوة مسلم peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/whos-a...
  9. سليمان : وكالة المخابرات المركزية والرجل في القاهرة ...... peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/suleim...
  10. ميغابايت [مسلم الإخوان] تدين القاعدة الدعوة... peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/mb-mus...
  11. مصر الثورة -- الإيمان أو الاقتصاد؟ اقرأ المزيد> peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypt-...
  12. هي جماعة الاخوان المسلمين مسلم سيء فعلا ل مصر ؟ : wp.me/pmUrV-t2
  13. مصر : مسلم الإخوان والتصورات وmisplac... peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypt-...
  14. المصري الحائز على جائزة نوبل زويل يعرض 5 - نقطة في حل... peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypti...
  15. ثروة من حسني مبارك والأسرة الفساد القوات المسلحة الكونغولية... peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/wealth...
  16. . مصر : على المدى القصير السيناريو peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypt-...
  17. مصر : أرض الأقباط peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/egypt-...
  18. Wht في الفرق بين نيلسون مانديلا والرئيس حسني مبارك. http://peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/arab-streets-loud-message.html
  19. ومنعت النخبة [والمصري Revolutio]... نديم باراتشا peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/reacti...
  20. الشرق الأوسط : الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية والغرب يرحب تغيير لكن المخاوف أولا.. peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/sheik-...
  21. رئيس الوزراء التركي ظهورهم مصر المحتجون -- الشرق الأوسط ، يخرج الباكستانيين ، ودعم الاخوةenglish.aljazeera.net / الأخبار / middleeas... عبر @ ajenglish
  22. الاستقلال لا يتحقق من دون مقاومة الظلم والاستبداد...
  23. حكم دمى في يد الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية الغربية ، والامبريالية اسرائيل باتت معدودة.. مسلم في العالم وسوف كسر شيكل من الاستعمار الجديد ، وعلى مقاومة
  24. اسرائيل مبارك عصر مخاوف 'آخر' peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/israel...
  25. التحقق من ذلك ارتفاعا من تونس مصر [وما وراءها؟] الأمريكية Persp... peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/01/from-t...
  26. وزير إسرائيلي يحث مصر لاستخدام القوة (ضد شعبه] peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/01/israel...
  27. يمكن أن تصمد أمام موجة من سلطة الشعب في العالم العربي ، في أفغانستان و باكستان -- وما بعده؟peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/01/new-su...
  28. كيف يمكن لهذه استسلام ، sellouts والإذلال يلاحظها أحد من قبل شعوب هذه المنطقة من موريتانيا ومصر إلى باكستان و اندونيسيا ؟
  29. السلطة الفلسطينية أصبحت الأعلى الخصي الإسرائيلية ، علنا وسرا الهتاف اسرائيل 'الحرب ضد ق غزةوخنق الضفة الغربية .
  30. مصر تحت حسني مبارك ، دمية في يد الولايات المتحدة و اسرائيل وقد تم بالتعاون مع اسرائيل لإحكام الخناق حول القاتل غزة .
  31. المملكة العربية السعودية ، مصر اتهم حزب الله عندما اسرائيل بدأ غزو لبنان في عام 2006 ؛ تكرارها مرة أخرى عندما اسرائيل ذبح في غزة
  32. الأحداث الجارية مارك محاولة أخرى من قبل شريحة مهمة من العالم الإسلامي لوضع حد للركود في التاريخ فرضت عليهم.
  33. قوى الطغيان في تعاون وثيق مع دمية الماجستير في الولايات المتحدة ، اسرائيل ، بريطانيا وفرنسا ، وسوف تستخدم القوة الغاشمة لقمع صعود سلطة الشعب
  34. موجة جديدة من سلطة الشعب في الشرق الأوسط peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/01/new-su...
  35. بداية نهاية الظالمين الفاسدين. العالم ، الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية وينبغي أن الغرب الدعم الكامل من الشعب / الدول العربية مسلم peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/01/beginn...
  36. كندا وإسرائيل : علاقة خاصة أخرى peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/01/canada...
  37. تذكر المصريين : "إن الله لن يغير نعمة الذي قال انه قد أنعم على الناس ما لم تغير الداخلية الأنفس.." [8:53 ]
  38. "الله.. التغييرات أبدا بقوم حتى انهم يعتزمون تغيير ما بأنفسهم..." [القرآن الكريم ؛ 13:11 ]
  39. إن ٱلله لا يغير ما بقوم حتى يغيروا ما بأنفسهم ".
  40. جافني Fearmongering يزال حوالي الشريعة في الولايات المتحدة peace-forum.blogspot.com/2011/02/gaffne...
  41. المصريون الصلاة (29:30) "رب المساعدات لي ضد هؤلاء الناس مؤذ. "قال رب انصرنى على القوم المفسدين 
  42. مصر (29:30) الكثير وقال : "يا رب ، والمعونة لي ضد هؤلاء الناس مؤذ. "قال رب انصرنى على القوم المفسدين ) 29:30
  43. ذا جآء نصر الله والفتح) 110:1 (
  44. عندما مساعدة تأتي من الله ، والنصر (منح) [القرآن ؛ 110:1]
  45. الطغاة لا قلب أو الخوف من الله ، نهايتها بائسة عادة مثل هتلر. الحرية لها ثمن.. Sacrifces
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
علماء کا کام قرآن کریم کے مطابق کیا ہے ؟
 لوگوں کی دینی تعلیم و تربیت یا حکومت و سیاست ؟


What is the Role of Islamic Scholars in Society, according to Quran?
Preaching and Teaching Islam or Power Politics?
<<Clck Here>>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Humanity, Religion, Culture, Ethics, Science, Spirituality & Peace
Peace Forum Network