Featured Post

SalaamOne NetWork

SalaamOne سلام   is   a nonprofit e-Forum to promote peace among humanity, through understanding and tolerance of religions, cul...

Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

SalaamOne NetWork


SalaamOneسلام  is a nonprofit e-Forum to promote peace among humanity, through understanding and tolerance of religions, cultures & other human values......[.......]

علم اور افہام و تفہیم کے لئے ایک غیر منافع بخش ای فورم ہے. علم،انسانیت، مذہب، سائنس، سماج، ثقافت، اخلاقیات اورروحانیت امن کے لئے.اس فورم کو آفتاب خان،  آزاد محقق اور مصنف نے منظم کیا ہے. تحقیقی کام دس سال سے "ڈیفنس جرنل" میں تسلسل سے چھپ رہا ہے جو کہ بلاگز، ویب سائٹ، سوشل میڈیا، میگزین، ویڈیو چننل اور برقی کتابوں کی صورت میں دستیاب ہے.اس  نیٹ ورک  کو اب تک لاکھوں افراد وزٹ کر چکے ہیں-


The enterprise is managed by Aftab Khan, a freelance researcher and writer. His work and collection is available in the form of e-Books. articles, magazines, videos, posts at social media, blogs & video channels. The  Forum is open to  all the rational, peace loving  people of any faith, gender or race. You may join at social media , invite your friends and share the stuff. The NetWork It has been visited by over  Millions of people around the world. This forum offers a variety of topics for the interest of the readers to choose. Check out Index

This site is focused on humanity in general and the followers of three Abrahamic religions. It provides additional information on religion, history, culture, tolerance, islamophobia, conflicts, opinions and other contemporary issues. Over 200 pages  provide sufficient information on the variety of subjects of interest grouped in 60 categories and 200 tags. 

Index- انڈکس 
  1. Quran Topics قرآن -  مضامین
  2. SalaamOne.com
  3. الخلافة Al Khilafah
  4. Riba Resolved ربا کا حل
  5.  Just One God
  6.  Peace-Forum
  7.  Takfiri Terrorism: Daesh,Taliban,Boko Haram
  8.  Women Folks
  9.  Islamophobia
  10.  Free Books & Articles
  11.  Bible, Christ & Christianity
  12.  Pakistan-Posts
  13.  Aftab Khan-net 
  14. www.Facebook.com/SalaamOne
  15. www.Twitter.com/SalaamOne 
      FAQs >>


      SOCIAL MEDIA:

      VIDEO CHANNELS:

      This was a brief  introduction, for more details  about "SalaamOne" <<<<click here >>>>>

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      SalaamOne.Com



      علم اور افہام و تفہیم کے لئے [سلام SalaamOne]  ایک غیر منافع بخش ای فورم ہے، جو علم کے زریعہ انسانیت کو امن کے قریب لانے کی ایک کوشش ہے .اس فورم کو آفتاب خان نے منظم کیا ہے. تحقیقی کام بلاگز، ویب سائٹ، سوشل میڈیا، میگزین، ویڈیو چننل اور برقی کتابوں کی صورت میں دستیاب ہے. اس Index - انڈیکس  پر منتخب پوسٹس کی مختصر لسٹ ہے ، مزید تفصیلات کے لیے "Search", Categories, Tabs" پر تلاش کریں -   نیٹ ورک  کو اب تک لاکھوں افراد وزٹ کر چکے ہیں, مزید تفصیلات .....

      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
      Islamic Revival Messages رساله تجديد الاسلام ‏

      An in-depth study of the Qur’an and Islamic religious history reveals startling facts. “Risala-e-Tajdeed-ul-Islam” is a message to develop positive change in the thought and practices of Muslims.
      قرآن اور اسلام کے گہرے مطالعه سےحیران کن حقائق کا انکشاف ہوا، "رساله تجديد الاسلام" مسلمانوں کے انداز فکروعمل میں مثبت تبدیلی کا پیغام ہے:

      Key facts about government-favored religion around the world


      Throughout history, many kingdoms and nations have closely aligned themselves with religion by establishing official, government-endorsed faiths. Today, more than 80 countries either have an official religion or favor one or more religious groups over others, according to a new Pew Research Center report.

      Countries that have an official religion, such as Iran or the United Kingdom, confer an official and legal status to one faith group, often granting that group benefits not available to other religions. Some nations do not officially endorse a faith, but instead favor or prefer a religion by granting financial, legal or other benefits to one (or occasionally more than one) religious group – as is the case with the Roman Catholic Church in Italy and Spain.

      Countries without an official or preferred religion, such as the United States and Brazil, may have explicitly secular constitutions or basic laws that guarantee religious freedom, although this alone does not qualify them for this category. In addition to these laws, governments in these countries seek to avoid giving tangible benefits to one religious group over others (although they may evenhandedly provide benefits to many religious groups). Other countries, meanwhile, are either officially or unofficially hostile to religion, often making it very difficult for any faith group to practice freely.

      Here are five key facts about countries that favor religious groups and those that do not:

      1Roughly one-in-five (22%) of the world’s nations have an official state religion and a similar share (20%) have a preferred or favored faith tradition. The majority (53%) of the 199 countries we examined, including the U.S., have no official or preferred religion. Another 5% of the world’s nations are officially hostile to or extremely restrictive of religious institutions. Although a number of formerly communist countries now have official or preferred religions, all of the 10 countries that are hostile to or extremely restrictive of religion are either ruled by communist governments, such as China and Cuba, or are former communist states, such as Kazakhstan.


      2Islam is the official religion in nearly two-thirds of the countries (27 of 43) with an official state-endorsed faith. Most of the countries where Islam, or a sect of Islam, is the state religion are in the Middle East and North Africa region (59%), including Saudi Arabia and all of its neighbors. Most of the remaining countries where Islam is the official faith are in the Asia-Pacific region, including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Malaysia. In most of the remaining countries with a state religion, that religion is Christianity or a denomination of Christianity; these include Denmark, the Dominican Republic and Zambia.


      3Christianity is favored in seven-in-ten countries where the government has an unofficial, but preferred religion. Most of these 28 countries are in Europe or the Americas; they include Italy, Poland and Russia, as well as Argentina and Guatemala. Four states, including Burma (Myanmar) and Sri Lanka, favor Buddhism, while three nations, including Turkey and Syria, favor Islam. Five additional countries, including Eritrea and Serbia, favor multiple faith traditions. In Eritrea, for instance, the state recognizes four religious groups: the Eritrean Orthodox Church, Sunni Islam, the Roman Catholic Church and the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Eritrea. All other religious groups are required to register with the government and must cease religious activities until those registrations are approved. The Eritrean government has not approved registration for any additional religious group since 2002.

      4Religious groups that either are officially recognized or unofficially favored usually receive state funding or other resources for religious education, the building and upkeep of places of worship, and other activities. More than eight-in-ten countries (86%) with an official religion give religious education funding that disproportionately favors the official religion. And over half (51%) provide disproportionate funding or resources to the official faith for their religious property (such as a church or mosque). In countries with an unofficial but preferred religion, a third (33%) give disproportionate funding or resources for religious property, and 45% do so for other religious activities, including pilgrimages and salaries for clergy.

      5Countries with an official or preferred religion are more likely than those without to have government restrictions on religion. Using a modified version of Pew Research Center’s Government Restrictions Index – a 10-point scale on which governments with the most religiously restrictive policies score a 10 – countries with a state religion have a median score 4.8. That compares with a score of 2.8 for countries with a preferred religion and 1.8 for those without an official or preferred faith group. This analysis excludes the 10 countries that are hostile to religious institutions.


      Topics: Religion and Society, Religion and Government, Religious Affiliation, Restrictions on Religion

      Sign up to receive the Pew Research weekly newsletter featuring a round-up of recent research, and new analysis on politics, the media and more.
      http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/03/key-facts-about-government-favored-religion-around-the-world/
      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~  ~


      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~  ~
      Humanity, Knowledge, Religion, Culture, Tolerance, Peace
      انسانیت ، علم ، اسلام ،معاشرہ ، برداشت ، سلامتی 
      Books, Articles, Blogs, Magazines,  Videos, Social Media
      بلاگز، ویب سائٹس،سوشل میڈیا، میگزین، ویڈیوز,کتب
      سلام فورم نیٹ ورک  Peace Forum Network 
      Join Millions of visitors: لاکھوں وزٹرز میں شامل ہوں 
      Salaamforum.blogspot.com 
      سوشل میڈیا پر جوائین کریں یا اپنا نام ، موبائل نمر923004443470+ پر"وہٹس اپپ"یا SMS کریں   
      Join 'Peace-Forum' at Social Media, WhatsApp/SMS Name,Cell#at +923004443470
           
        
      Facebook: fb.me/AftabKhan.page

      Science and Religion in the 21st Century

      Geo-ethics and Geo-theology: The contribution of religious values to environmental conservation



      Religions may play a very relevant role in environmental conservation. On one hand, they provide cosmological visions that help to explain human-nature relations and on how humans should relate to their environment. On the other hand, religions include a set of moral values, which would help to change economic and social behaviors that are behind the current ecological crisis.
      The goal of this lecture will be to identify points of convergence between the great religious traditions in addressing human-nature relations, as well as presenting a critical evaluation of whether those approaches have in fact affect environmental conservation in representative countries. Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism have been considered. 
      The main traditions considered are: 

      (1) dominion: humans are at the top of Creation and use the natural resources as needed; 

      (2) stewardship: humans have a delegate dominion over Creation and are responsible and accountable for their use of natural resources; 

      (3) empathy: nature follows moral behavior of humans; 

      (4) analogy: nature is an image of God;

      (5) God worshipper, nature gives glory to God 

      (6) natural mysticism, union with God is accomplished through contemplation of the created world;

      (7) worship: nature is sacred. These approaches are not necessary conflicting, but rather they can be considered in some cases as complementary. Their actual impact of water and environmental conservation should be further researched.
      https://scienceandreligion21.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/geo-ethics-and-geo-theology-the-contribution-of-religious-values-to-environmental-conservation/
      .....................................................................

      Conservation and Islam

      Conservation and Islam



      Islam is a complete code of life, a religion which guides humans in every sphere. It emphasizes cleanliness and urges followers to adopt every measure to maintain it in all circumstances. It forbids excess, injustice and unlawfulness in words and action. It stresses conservation and helps to inculcate a sense of responsibility among people.
      Today, the world has become a global village, where individuals can play an important role in the development of society and environment. Islam, one the largest religions of the world gives attention to protecting the environment and biodiversity for the well being of humans and urges the Muslim community to show support for the conservation of environment.
      While the West proclaims itself to be the forerunners in conservation, it realized too little too late that the developments made in the industrial era affected the course of nature. Environmental conservation is one of the basic tenets of Islam.
      Environmental conservation is one of the basic tenets of Islam
      In the Holy Quran and Sunnah, humans are guided towards purity and cleanliness. Moreover, Islam has given a complete code to protect the environment and stressed the need to promote sustainability. Almighty Allah and the Holy Prophet (PBUH) paid special attention in protecting the environment and stopped people from harming the wild.
      Today our soil is deteriorating, forests are being chopped down, fish stocks are declining and immediate steps are required to protect natural resources so that ecosystems are not affected. Nature conservation should be kept in mind as this is the real virtue Allah Almighty has asked from us. Disorder in this balanced natural system will result in the destruction of human, animal and plant life on Earth.
      tft-20-p-20-b
      Unfortunately, deforestation has changed the course of nature in Pakistan. A 2009 report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) showed that the annual deforestation rate in Pakistan is 2.1 per cent per annum, which is the highest in Asia. Our global actions have also increased our vulnerability to climate change, as now we are experiencing an increase of extreme weathering events. This is further confirmed by the German Watch Institute, a German think tank, which ranked Pakistan among the top 10 countries most vulnerable to climate change. Its Climate Risk Index for 2012: the 10 most affected countries identified Pakistan as the third most affected country from climate change, after Haiti and the Philippines.
      To deal with such anthropogenic issues, the Holy Quran guides us in maintaining a balanced natural environment, as it is a great favour bestowed on human beings by Allah Almighty:
      ‘Who hath appointed the Earth a resting place for you, and the sky a canopy: and causeth water to pour down from the sky, thereby producing fruits as food for you…’ [Al-Baqarah: 22]
      This verse shows that Allah the Most Merciful has made this universe subservient to man and taught man the ways of benefitting from it for his needs.
      Islam stresses on the protection of every living species on Earth
      Islam stresses on the protection of every living species on Earth
      At another instance Allah Almighty said:
      ‘And when he turneth away (from thee) his effort in the land is to make mischief therein and to destroy the crops and the cattle; and Allah loveth not mischief.’ [Al- Baqarah: 204-205]
      This ayat shows that man is responsible for creating mischief in the universe. At various instances humans, due to overexploitation of natural resources, have created complex problems for themselves such as pollution, deforestation, climate change, global warming and extinction of different species, etc.
      If we just value one of the basic resources, water, we’ll come to realize that it’s a blessing in disguise, as it helps in sustaining life on Earth and the Quran clearly states that every living thing is made of water. Thus according to the Quran and Sunnah, it is not permissible to waste water.  As in verse 31 of Surah Al-A‘raf Allah Almighty said:
      ‘O Children of Adam! Look to your adornment at every place of worship, and eat and drink, but be not prodigal. Lo! He loveth not the prodigals.’
      The Holy Prophet (PBUH) was the first to establish environmentally protected areas
      This verse clearly states that wastage of water is not allowed at any cost. The Holy Prophet (PBUH) discouraged the wastage of water even during ablution (wuzu). The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) saw a person wasting water while performing ablution and said to him:
      ‘Don’t be extravagant’
      The Holy Prophet (PBUH) was the first to establish environmentally protected areas in which felling of trees and killing of animals was prohibited. He declared an area of 20 km out of each section of Al-Madina al-Munawwarah as a protected area and prohibited cutting of trees and branches except what was required for driving camels.
      The Holy Prophet (PBUH) said: “I declare Madina as a sanctuary, and like Makkah, the area in between its two mountains shall be a protected area. Its trees shall not be cut, except the extent that is needed to drive camels” (Ref: Sahih Bukhari, Kitab al-‘I ‘tisam bi’ 1-Kitab wa’s-Sunnah, Bab ma yukrihu min kathratis-su ‘ali wa takallufi ma la ya ‘nihi, Hadith No. 2792)
      Deforestation has changed the course of nature in Pakistan
      The Holy Prophet (PBUH) also prohibited Muslims from destroying crops and trees during war. He also stressed maintaining a clean environment, which can be judged from the following verse narrated by Abu Malik al-Ash‘ari that:-
      ‘Cleanliness is half of faith…..’
      In short many diseases can be avoided by keeping the environment clean; otherwise the deteriorating environment can affect human life.
      The Holy Prophet (PBUH) was also very affectionate towards animals and birds and prohibited beating animals without justification. The Messenger of Allah (Peace Be Upon Him) said:
      ‘Whosoever killed a sparrow unjustly, it will complain before Allah saying O! Allah such and such person had killed me unjustly and he had not killed me for any benefit.’ (Ref: Sunan al-Nasa’I, kitab al-dahaya, bab man qatala ‘usfuran bighayri haqqiha. Hadith No. 4446)
      Pakistan is ranked third in Climate Risk Index’s most affected countries
      In another instance, our Holy Prophet (PBUH) said: ‘Leave the birds in their nests to live peacefully’ (Ref: Sunan Abu Da’ud, kitab al-Adaha, bab fil ‘aqiqati. Hadith No. 2835)
      These Ahadith show the concern of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) in protecting wildlife and environment and prove that Islam is a complete code of life which not only gives equal right to human beings but also stresses on the protection of every living species on Earth. It stops humans from killing animals for the sake of recreation, as indiscriminate hunting may cause danger to the survival of wildlife, the permission of which is not given in the Holy Quran or Sunnah.
      Even the Indonesian Council of Ulema passed a fatwa titled ‘The Protection of Endangered Species to Maintain the Balanced Ecosystems’. The Ulema Council regards the endangered species i.e. tigers, rhinos and elephants and different types of mammals a creation of Allah Almighty in order to maintain a balanced ecosystem, meant for the interests of sustainable human welfare. Humans should therefore protect the ecosystem and wildlife otherwise it can deteriorate human life. The fatwa clearly mentioned illegal hunting of endangered species to be haram and to take immediate measures to conserve them.
      tft-20-p-20-e
      This can also be applied in Pakistan, which hosts rich biodiversity such as the common leopard, snow leopard, turtles, markhor and different species of birds. The Ulema Councils of Pakistan should also play an important role in conservation of threatened and endangered species in the country.
      Allah Almighty in different verses of the Holy Quran laid stress on the protection of the environment and informed us about the numerous blessings he bestowed us with. Forests are a valuable asset as they render great ecosystem services by hosting biodiversity, replenishing the underground aquifer, preventing soil erosion, reducing the impacts of flash floods, mitigating climate change and global warming. Keeping in view their immense importance we should take special care so that deforestation can be curbed and afforestation can take place simultaneously.
      Today, the increase in the world’s population has exerted tremendous pressure on natural resources as the recent Living Planet Report 2014 by WWF confirms that humanity’s demand on the planet is 50 per cent more than what nature can renew, meaning it will take 1.5 Earths to produce the resources necessary to support our current ecological footprint.
      Food and water scarcity – a global issue
      Food and water scarcity – a global issue
      If we implement Islamic principles in our daily lives and make our consumption patterns sustainable, we can easily maintain a balance between our resources and needs. Consequently, this will help to alleviate food and water scarcity, which are some of the major issues the world faces and we will be in a position to lead a sustainable life where humans live in harmony with nature.
      The writer is a freelance journalist. He tweets @SyedMAbubakar and can be reached at s.m.abubakar@hotmail.com
      Courtesy: http://www.thefridaytimes.com/tft/conservation-and-islam/

      More:

      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~  ~
      Knoweledge, Religion, Culture, Tolerance, Peace
      Peace Forum Network
      Visited by Millions
      Frequently Asked Questions <<FAQ>>
      .                                   ......               .

      Americans are losing faith in religion’s ability to help solve social problems

      Image result for aMERICA LOSING faith in religion

      Throughout US history, religious leaders and institutions have played a vital role in addressing the issues of the day. The Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina, which witnessed a horrific shooting in June last year, was used in the struggle against slavery as a site for organizing and activism. Martin Luther King Jr.’s leadership of the civil rights movement was definitively shaped by his role as a preacher.
      However, the share of Americans who think that churches, synagogues, and other houses of worship contribute to solving crucial social problems is declining rapidly, according to a new study by the Pew Research Center.
      In August 2008, 75% of Americans said that religious institutions and leaders contributed at least somewhat to solving societal problems. That percentage had fallen to 65% by July 2012, and further declined to 58% in the most recent survey.
      Roughly 4 in 10 Americans now say that religious leaders and institutions do not make a significant contribution to solving social problems.
      The changing perceptions of Americans on the role of religion could be partially attributed to the growth in population of those with no religious affiliation. (Between 2007 and 2014, the percentage of Americans who described themselves as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular” rose from 16.1% to 22.8%, according to Pew research.)
      As might be expected, those with no religious affiliation are less likely to think that religious institutions play an active role in solving societal ills. Only 38% of the non-affiliated say that religious leaders and institutions make a contribution in this area, as compared with 65% of Protestants and 63% of Catholics.
      “Part of what’s reflected here is the changing religious composition of the country,” said Greg Smith, deputy director of religion research at Pew Research Center and one of the lead authors of the report.
      However, that does not explain the shift entirely. The percentage of those who believe that churches help solve social problems has declined almost equally across age, religious belief, geographical location, and political affiliation. “It is striking just how broad-based this change is,” said Smith.
      If organized religion indeed is retreating as a force for social change, it doesn’t necessarily mean that activism itself is waning.
      In a 2015 opinion piece in the Washington Post, social activist Rahiel Tesfamariam pointed to the decentralized nature of movements like Black Lives Matter, and argued that modern activism in many cases no longer needs, or even desires, the imprimatur of churches.
      In the 1960s, she wrote, the authority of clergy “infused the civil rights movement with traditional values—hierarchical leadership, respectability politics and the guiding principles of reconciliation and nonviolence. Today’s movement has dismissed these criteria, operating without centralized leadership and accepting as many straight women and LGBTQ people on the front lines as straight men.”
      Follow us on Twitter @qz. Read more at qz.com.

      http://qz.com/735325/americans-are-losing-faith-in-religions-ability-to-help-solve-social-problems/
      Related:
      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~  ~
      Humanity, ReligionCultureSciencePeace
       A Project of 
      Peace Forum Network
      Peace Forum Network Mags
      BooksArticles, BlogsMagazines,  VideosSocial Media
      Overall 2 Million visits/hits

      Religion is not doomed

      Books Contrary to what secularists believe, a new book argues that ‘the world is more religious than ever’ | Rodney Stark
      Rodney Stark is a sociologist and historian of religion who at age 81 remains a distinguished professor of the social sciences at Baylor University. Stark’s clear writing—he was a newspaper reporter before going to graduate school—distinguishes him from most academics. His argument that Christian practice wasn’t as common in the Middle Ages or in 18th century America as we like to think distinguishes him from some church-oriented historians. The argument in his new book, The Triumph of Faith, that “the world is more religious than ever,” distinguishes him from “new atheists” who seem ready to take a victory lap. Stark’s The Triumph of Christianity: How the Jesus Movement Became the World’s Largest Religion(HarperOne) was WORLD Magazine’s 2012 Book of the Year. I also interviewed him back in 2007. Here, with permission from the publisher, ISI Books, is the last chapter of The Triumph of Faith, published last month. —Marvin Olasky Conclusion: 
      Why Faith Endures Whether or not it is so, the universe testifies to intelligent design. Even the militant atheist Richard Dawkins agrees that “living systems give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.”[1] Of course, Dawkins goes on to argue that this is a false appearance—that the whole universe is an accident without purpose or meaning. But the point stands that life, indeed the entire physical universe, seems so complex and yet so orderly that to regard it as a pointless accident seems absurd. Again, the truth of intelligent design is irrelevant to my purpose here. That design seems self-evident to most people is sufficient.

      To assume intelligent design is, of course, to assume a creator, and this, in turn, supposes that there is a supernatural consciousness. Thus have humans repeatedly “discovered” the existence of a god or gods. And if people accept the existence of a supernatural consciousness, it is inevitable that they will seek its blessings, for the supernatural is a plausible source of many things humans greatly desire, some of which are otherwise unobtainable. Many of these desires are for tangible things such as good crops, protection against the elements or enemies, health, and fertility, and potentially tangible things such as life after death. People also desire intangibles, such as happiness or that there be meaning and purpose to life. In pursuit of all such rewards, people will attempt to enlist the aid of the supernatural, which raises the question: what does the supernatural desire? Sometimes this question is answered through reason (theology), sometimes through trial and error; and sometimes people experience what they perceive to be communications from the supernatural (revelations).[2] This is how religion arises and endures. I have analyzed this process of the origin and evolution of religion at great length elsewhere.[3] Here it is sufficient to consider several basic issues. Perhaps the most important is the claim that religious faith is irrational, an assumption based in part on the additional premise that religion was originated by ignorant and irrational primitives and thus is rooted in crude superstition. Religion and Rationality There are two rather different claims involved in the charge that it is irrational to be religious. One is that religious beliefs are, in and of themselves, irrational because they are demonstrably untrue. The second is that people do not reason about their religious choices but simply take them for granted based on the culture into which they are born. Both claims are easily exposed as false. 
      Although endlessly proclaimed by professional atheists, the charge that religion is intrinsically irrational is based on the ignorant claim that scientific “laws” about the material world govern the immaterial realm postulated by religion. Carl Sagan frequently and smugly asserted that miracles can’t happen because they violate laws of nature. For example, the Red Sea could not have parted to allow Moses and the Israelites to escape from Egypt because no physical principles involving tides or currents could have made it possible—as if that would come as shattering news to the religious believer. What Sagan could not grasp was that nothing qualifies as a miracle unless it violates laws of nature. The Old Testament does not claim that Moses chose the very moment of a rare tidal phenomenon to lead his people out of Egypt; it says that God worked a miracle and parted the sea just long enough for the Israelites to pass. It may be that this miracle didn’t happen, but to say it could not have done so because it violates the laws of nature misses the point entirely. More generally, the claim that science disproves religion is nonsensical. Science is limited to study of the natural, empirical world. It can say nothing about the existence or nature of a nonempirical realm. Of course, one is free to argue that there is no nonempirical world, but one may not cite “scientific proof” of that claim. Secularists insist on portraying science and religion as being in opposition. But the truth is that modern science arose because of religion. Science began and flourished only in the West. Why? Because only Christians and Jews (also Muslims) conceived of God as a rational creator and concluded that therefore the universe must run according to rational principles that could be discovered.[4] 

      Elsewhere in the world it was assumed that the universe was an incomprehensible mystery, an object suitable for meditation only. The uniquely Judeo-Christian notion of a universe functioning according to rational principles inspired a group of learned figures—mostly very religious people—on to groundbreaking scientific discoveries. A study of the fifty-two most important scientists of the era known as the “Scientific Revolution” (1543–1680) demonstrated that thirty-one were extremely devout (many were clergy members, in fact), twenty were conventionally religious, and only one (Edmond Halley) was irreligious.[5] As to whether or not people are rational about accepting and practicing their religion, consider that 44 percent of Americans have adopted a religious affiliation different from that of their parents.[6]

      Although a few American sons and daughters of religious parents choose to drop out of religion entirely, the majority of those raised in irreligious homes choose to become religious.[7] Moreover, even those who don’t leave the religion in which they were raised choose whether to be active or inactive in pursuing their faith, and this is true around the world. Choose is the critical verb; it assumes rationality. But to assume rationality is not to assume that human beings follow the path of pure reason in all ways at all times. No competent social scientists who begin their analysis of human behavior with the assumption of rationality believe our brains are little computers that always choose to gain the most at the least cost. Instead, everyone knows that humans are subject to many factors and forces that affect their decisions. It is more accurate to say: Within the limits of their information and understanding, restricted by available options, guided by their preferences and tastes, humans attempt to make rational choices. The first part of this proposition—within the limits of their information—recognizes that we cannot select choices if we do not know about them, and that we cannot select the most beneficial choice if we have incorrect knowledge about the relative benefits of choices. The second part—within the limits of their … understanding—acknowledges that people must make choices based on a set of principles, beliefs, or theories they hold about how things work. Such baseline assumptions may be false, as the history of science demonstrates, but the rational person applies his or her principles because these are, for that moment, the most plausible assumptions. 
      Finally, of course, people may select only from among available options, and the full range of choices actually available may not be evident to them. If humans attempt to make rational choices, why is it that they do not always act alike? Why don’t people reared in the same culture all seek the same rewards? Because their choices are guided by their preferences and tastes. This helps us understand not only why people do not all act alike but also why it is possible for them to engage in exchanges: to swap one reward for another—as a child I often traded my dessert to my sister in return for her second pork chop. Of course, not all preferences and tastes are variable—clearly there are things that virtually everyone values regardless of their culture or upbringing: food, shelter, security, and affection among them. Obviously, too, culture in general, and socialization in particular, will have a substantial impact on preferences and tastes. It is neither random nor purely a matter of personal taste whether someone prays to Allah or Shiva, or, indeed, whether one prays at all. Still, the fact remains that within any culture, there is substantial variation in preferences and tastes. Some of this variation is at least partly the result of socialization differences—for example, we probably learn our preferences concerning highly liturgical services as children. But a great deal of variation is so idiosyncratic that people have no idea how they came to like or dislike certain things. 
      As the old adage says, “There’s no accounting for tastes.” Finally, as implied by the word attempt in the phrase “humans attempt to make rational choices,” people don’t always act in entirely rational ways. Sometimes we act impulsively—in haste, passion, boredom, or anger (“I really didn’t stop to think about what I was doing”). Sometimes human also err because they are lazy, careless, or neurotic. All that said, most of the time normal human beings will choose what they perceive to be the more reasonable option, and whenever they do so, their behavior is fully rational, even if they are mistaken. It follows that the religious choices people make are as rational as their other choices: religion offers things most people very much desire and does so with considerable plausibility. Little of what people know about the world is the result of their own experience. For example, few have an experiential basis for knowing that the earth is round, let alone that the stars are distant suns. People “know” these things because they have been taught them by others in whom they have confidence. 
      The same applies to religion: people are confident in a religion because others whom they respect express their confidence in it. People not only testify to their certainty in the truth of a religion but also often enumerate personal “proofs” that religion is true. Recall from chapter 10 that 55 percent of American adults believe they have been “protected from harm by a guardian angel.” Twenty percent testify that they have heard “the voice of God speaking.” In addition, 23 percent claim to have “witnessed a miraculous, physical healing,” and 16 percent say that they themselves have “received a miraculous, physical healing.”[8] This is not peculiar to Americans; in most other major religions in most of the rest of the world, similar testimonials abound. For most people, such proofs that religion is true are as convincing as claims by scientists that, for example, the universe came into being suddenly via the Big Bang—this, too, most people must accept on faith alone. Critics such as Richard Dawkins would challenge this comparison by noting that, although laypeople must rely on testimony concerning the Big Bang, the scientists on whom they rely have firm empirical evidence for their claims. But many who offer testimonials as to the truth of religion believe they have firm empirical evidence, too: if you were sure you had been grabbed by invisible hands and saved from falling into traffic, might you tend to believe you had solid proof of the existence of angels? In any event, it is hardly irrational for most people to believe in religion, even if they are wrong. 
      Primitive Philosophers All the early social scientists, including Herbert Spencer (1820–1903), Edward Burnett Tylor (1832–1917), and Emile Durkheim (1858–1917), agreed that the religion of primitive societies was crude to the point of being absurd. Spencer claimed that early humans were unable to distinguish their dreams from their experiences while awake, were “without curiosity,” and even lacked any notion of cause and effect. Hence, their religious ideas were ignorant and “childlike.”[9] Tylor agreed that primitive humans lived in a “childish” world, cluttered with spirits.[10] Durkheim even dismissed the idea that religion involves the worship of a god or gods, claiming that the actual object of religious worship is always society itself—even if the worshippers remain ignorant of this “fact.”[11] These early scholars went further. They held that what was true of primitive religion was also true for the religions of modern times—even if this was obscured by elaborate theologies. Moreover, they believed that the flaws of primitive religions were “a weapon which could be used … with deadly effect against Christianity.”[12] As Charles Darwin put it in a letter to Tylor, upon having read his book Primitive Society, “It is wonderful how you trace [primitive religion] from the lower races up to the religious beliefs of the higher.”[13] Then came a shocking development. After studying a mountain of trustworthy reports from anthropological field studies of primitive tribes, Andrew Lang (1844–1912) revealed that most such tribes had a quasimonotheistic religion based on high gods: “moral, all-seeing directors of things and men … eternal beings who made the world and watch over morality.”[14] That is, rather than being crude and ignorant, the religions of even the most primitive groups reflected a clear concern to explain the meaning and purpose of life. In 1927 the distinguished anthropologist Paul Radin (1883–1959) published Primitive Man as Philosopher—a collection of interviews with members of preliterate societies (before any contact with missionaries) on the great philosophical questions about the origin and meaning of life. A Greenland Eskimo explained: “Thou must not imagine that no Greenlander thinks about these things. … Certainly there must be some Being who made all these things.”[15] Lang’s and Radin’s work caused a wholesale revision of anthropological claims about primitive religion—but it has been met with the counterclaim that all religious answers to existential questions are primitive and pointless.[16] 
      The Need for Meaning Just as many of the secularization faithful continue mistakenly to believe that primitive people could not engage in “sophisticated” thought, these same academics generally assume that few people around the world today ever think about the “big” philosophical questions such as the meaning and purpose of life. It is widely claimed that most people simply believe what they are told, accepting without further reflection the answers provided by the religious culture into which they were born. But that’s not so, as shown in Table C–1 (download). The overwhelming majority of people on earth do think about the meaning and purpose of life. China is lowest, but even there half the population say they think about the meaning and purpose of life. Nearly everywhere else, three-fourths or more do so. Regional variations are modest, ranging from 89 percent in Sub-Saharan Africa to 76 percent in Asia. When people think about the meaning and purpose of life, what do they conclude? Do many end up agreeing with Richard Dawkins that life has “no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference”?[17] Whatever else one makes of this claim, it certainly is not a view that people will be eager to embrace; not even Dawkins’s most dedicated readers will find this claim sets their hearts soaring. People want life to have some purpose. And hardly anyone agrees with Dawkins that life does not serve any purpose, as can be seen in Table C–2 (download). Comparisons with Table 1–8 [from Chapter 1] (download) show that the percentage of people who think life serves no purpose is comparable to (but even lower than) the percentage of atheists in a country. Around the world, nearly everyone thinks their life has an important purpose or meaning, as shown in Table C–3 (download). Only in Hong Kong (62 percent) and Taiwan (66 percent) do fewer than 70 percent of the people think their life has an important purpose and meaning. In only a few nations is the percentage below 80, and in a great many it is above 90 percent. The Global Religious Awakening Contrary to the constant predictions that religion is doomed, there is abundant evidence of an ongoing worldwide religious awakening. Never before have four out of five people on earth claimed to belong to one of the great world faiths. Today there are millions of devout Protestants in Latin America; not so long ago there were none. Even so, Latin American Catholics are far more religious than ever before. Sub-Saharan Africa is now home to more churchgoing Christians than anywhere else on earth, and North Africa and the Middle East are ablaze with Muslim fervor. Hinduism has never been stronger, and India’s transport systems are straining to meet the demands of pilgrims. The Chinese have rebuilt tens of thousands of temples destroyed by the Red Guards, and millions have converted to Christianity. Only in parts of Europe are the churches still rather empty, but this is not the reliable sign of secularization it has long been said to be; it is, rather, a sign of lazy clergy and unsuitable established religions. As has been said, Europe is a continent of “believing non-belongers.” The three tables [mentioned above] (C–1, C–2, and C–3) help to reveal why religion endures. People want to know why the universe exists, not that it exists for no reason, and they don’t want their lives to be pointless. Only religion provides credible and satisfactory answers to the great existential questions. The most ardent wishes of the secularization faithful will never change that. Secularists have been predicting the imminent demise of religion for centuries. They have always been wrong—and their claims today are no different. It is their unshakeable faith in secularization that may be the most “irrational” of all beliefs. From The Triumph of Faith. Reprinted with permission by ISI Books. 

      COPYRIGHT © 2015 GOD’S WORLD PUBLICATIONS Home View this article on the full website. Religion is not doomed, http://flip.it/cvmzh

      ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~  ~
      Humanity, ReligionCultureSciencePeace
       A Project of 
      Peace Forum Network
      Peace Forum Network Mags
      BooksArticles, BlogsMagazines,  VideosSocial Media
      Overall 2 Million visits/hits