Skip to main content

Defeating Terrorism & Radicalisation of Muslim youth

Improving interfaith dialogue and collaboration, curbing intolerance and addressing extremism are the needs of the hour and Maajid Nawaaz seems like a man who is well-placed to address these needs.

A one on one with an ex-member of Hizbut Tahrir who renounced his links and is now addressing the challenges of extremism in the UK
A British of Pakistani roots (his father hails from Gujrat), Nawaaz is an activist, author, columnist and politician. An ex-member of Hizbut Tahrir, he was arrested in Egypt in 2002 and after his release four years later, Nawaaz renounced his links and turned to working towards challenging extremism in the UK.

With Ed Husain, a former radical like himself, Nawaaz co-founded Quilliam, a globally active think tank “focusing on matters of integration, citizenship and identity, religious freedom, extremism and immigration.” He then went on to write his autobiography Radical, and his second book Islam and the Future of Tolerance, co-authored with American neuroscientist Sam Harris, was published this October.

Nawaaz stresses that to address growing radicalisation and extremism, there is a need for them to be talked about and understood first.

“Radicalisation happens due to a combination of factors. You have real and perceived grievances that people feel. I say real and perceived because it is a matter of perspectives. People feel grieved and angry, and this is the first stage of radicalisation,” Nawaaz explains his theory.

Elaborating further, he discloses, “This then leads to an identity crisis, the second stage of radicalisation. In Europe, the identity crisis in European Muslim comes out in the form that they don’t feel they are European or British or French. They say ‘I am not British, I am not French, I am a Muslim’.”

Taking his explanation further, Nawaaz comes to the third factor that leads to radicalisation, “With grievances and identity crisis, people start looking for an alternative sense of belonging because they don’t belong where they are from. That brings in the third factor, which is charismatic recruiters who are preaching to these people by providing that sense of belonging. It’s a bit like a gang membership.

“And the fourth factor that kicks in after that is ideology. It is often the most neglected because we are comfortable speaking about economic challenges and unemployment, but we are not comfortable speaking about ideology because it means having uncomfortable conversations about ideas.

“With grievances and identity crisis, people start looking for an alternative sense of belonging because they don’t belong where they are from. That brings in the third factor, which is charismatic recruiters who are preaching to these people by providing that sense of belonging. It’s a bit like a gang membership.
“Ideology, or what I call ‘Islamism’, is the desire to impose my version of the religion over everyone else. All these groups, whichever name you call them, Taliban, Al-Qaida or ISIS, they all share a similar goal — to enforce their own version of religion on society. So I call it ‘Islamism’ rather than the religion of Islam.”

He firmly believes that an understanding of these four factors can help in reversing them through policy responses. To address people’s grievances, the legitimate and perceived grievances need to be identified and, according to Nawaaz, “where they are real, the government needs to respond to them. And where they are perceived, the government needs to improve its communication strategy. I’d say in every conflict, there are probably some real grievances and some perceived ones.

“Identity crisis also needs a broader conversation about an identity in belonging in a globalised context that also provides a sense of patriotism and reduces a sense of nationalism. So that should mean patriotism to Pakistan and reducing the ethnic nationalism that is pulling the country apart.”

Coming to the third factor, of the charismatic recruiters, Nawaaz, having firsthand experience of their appeal, urges the need to undermine their appeal and expose them for who they really are.

“Most of them are frauds,” the activist stresses. “Most have dubious backgrounds, we need to be able to critique them. And we need to provide alternate leaders who are able to appeal to these young people instead.”

To address ideology, the final factor leading to radicalisation, Nawaaz opines offering counter narratives that challenge the ideology that is exploiting the religion of Islam for political purposes.

“And we need to not only have counter-narratives but also alternative narratives. That would be for me, I believe, a pluralistic, democratic, human rights grounded vision which people would be able to live by to be ambassadors for that vision,” he concludes.
http://www.dawn.com/news/1225628

Popular posts from this blog

A historic moment in the Arab world

لحظة تاريخية في العالم العربي
As a democratic revolution led by tech-empowered young people sweeps the Arab world, Wadah Khanfar, Al Jazeera's director-general, shares a profoundly optimistic view of what's happening in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. In the first talk posted online from the TED 2011 conference in California, Khanfar describes the powerful moment when people realised they could step out of their homes and ask for change. "كما ثورة ديمقراطية بقيادة الشباب التكنولوجيا ذات صلاحيات تجتاح العالم العربي ، وضاح خنفر ، الجزيرة المدير العام والأسهم وجهة نظر متفائلة بشكل كبير ما يحدث في مصر وتونس وليبيا وخارجها. وفي اول حديث له نشر على الانترنت من مؤتمر تيد 2011 في ولاية كاليفورنيا ، خنفر يصف لحظة قوية عند الناس أدركت أنها لا يمكن الخروج من منازلهم ونطلب من أجل التغيير."
http://www.ted.com/talks/wadah_khanfar_a_historic_moment_in_the_arab_world.html This talk was given on March 1, 2011 in Long Beach, California. TED 2011 is taking place between March 1 and Mar…

Our Captured, Wounded Hearts: Arundhati Roy On Balakot, Kashmir And India

With his reckless “pre-emptive” airstrike on Balakot in Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has inadvertently undone what previous Indian governments almost miraculously, succeeded in doing for decades. Since 1947 the Indian Government has bristled at any suggestion that the conflict in Kashmir could be resolved by international arbitration, insisting that it is an “internal matter.” By goading Pakistan into a counter-strike, and so making India and Pakistan the only two nuclear powers in history to have bombed each other, Modi has internationalised the Kashmir dispute. He has demonstrated to the world that Kashmir is potentially the most dangerous place on earth, the flash-point for nuclear war. Every person, country, and organisation that worries about the prospect of nuclear war has the right to intervene and do everything in its power to prevent it.  Keep reading  >>>>


India has built around itself an aura of a global power whose time has come. For at least the last t…

Kashmir Jihad - Analysis & Options

PDF: http://bit.ly/2k0Vqpm

Kashmir is an incomplete agenda of partition of India. Since 1947, India and Pakistan have fought three wars on this issue. According to UN resolutions, Kashmiris have to decide their accession to Pakistan or India through impartial plebiscite, which could not take place due to Indian reluctance. Recently, India revoked Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Kashmir, it was done to unilaterally integrate occupied Kashmir. This is a violation of the UN resolutions and the Simla bilateral agreement, which demands to maintain status quo until the final settlement. The US and world powers are emphasizing that Kashmir should be resolved bilaterally, though India has refused to hold talks with Pakistan. In the present scenario, while India has turned Kashmir into the largest prison of 9 million people, denying basic human rights and oppressing the Kashmiris' who want freedom from India, Pakistan cannot watch as a silent spec…